Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi24 Indore14 Ahmedabad12 Jaipur10 Agra7 Surat6 Mumbai5 Pune4 Patna2 Hyderabad2 Allahabad1 Bangalore1 Jabalpur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)13 Section 44A6 Section 54B4 Deduction4 Penalty4 Addition to Income4 Section 2503 Business Income3 Condonation of Delay3

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

In the result, all the appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1837/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sarang Gudhate, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Tripathi, Addl.CIT

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 54B

penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 8. Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee has rectified the mistake immediately on the issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act. He also submitted that assessee could have easily revised the return because the due date of filing revised return was 31/03/2017 and the notice u/s

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

TULSABAI VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

ROHINI MARUTI DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

AJINKYA DILIP KOTEPATIL,,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1(3),, NASHIK