BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi107Mumbai78Jaipur31Chennai22Allahabad21Bangalore19Hyderabad18Ahmedabad12Kolkata8Indore8Guwahati5Nagpur3Lucknow3Pune3Cuttack2Chandigarh2Surat1Jodhpur1Raipur1Rajkot1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271D15Section 273B12Section 269S12Section 2713Section 269A3Cash Deposit3Penalty3

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- SANGLI, SANGLI

ITA 1099/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 269ASection 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 273B

u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act of Rs.1,01,75,465/- in respect of deposits from its members. 2. The Id CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the appellant Society is based in rural area and most of the members are illiterate and agriculturists having transactions below Rs 20000/-. 3. The learned CIT erred in law and on facts

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD SANGLI ,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- SANGLI, SANGLI

ITA 1100/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 269ASection 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 273B

u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act of Rs.1,01,75,465/- in respect of deposits from its members. 2. The Id CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the appellant Society is based in rural area and most of the members are illiterate and agriculturists having transactions below Rs 20000/-. 3. The learned CIT erred in law and on facts

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD SANGLI ,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- SANGLI , SANGLI

ITA 1101/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 269ASection 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 273B

u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act of Rs.1,01,75,465/- in respect of deposits from its members. 2. The Id CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the appellant Society is based in rural area and most of the members are illiterate and agriculturists having transactions below Rs 20000/-. 3. The learned CIT erred in law and on facts