Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 80P(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Bangalore40 Delhi24 Kolkata16 Jaipur14 Chennai11 Indore8 Ahmedabad6 Surat6 Cochin5 Chandigarh5 Telangana5 Pune4 Kerala3 Varanasi3 Karnataka2 Rajkot2 SC2 Visakhapatnam1 Panaji1 Nagpur1 Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271E13 Section 80P(2)(a)8 Section 143(3)4 Section 269S4 Section 271D3 Section 1323 Section 139(1)2 Section 80P2 Penalty2 Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1375/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh B. Budruk, Addl.CIT

Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

houses totaling to Rs. 3,59,50,000/- and Rs. 1,37,73,000/- as additional amount received. 12. Now, in the instant appeal, we are only concerned with the sum of Rs. 1,37,73,000/- which the Ld.AO has observed that assessee has received the said sum in cash against the transfer of immovable properties and thus invoked

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), PUNE, PUNE vs. PARSHWANATH NAGARI SAHAKARI PARSANSTHA MARYADIT, SATARA

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), PUNE, PUNE vs. PARSHWANATH NAGARI SAHAKARI PARSANSTHA MARYADIT, SATARA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BODHI TOWER vs. KUMAR BUILDERS PROJECT PUNE PRIVATE LIMITED, BUND GARDEN

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGOAN vs. SUNIL RAMNARAYAN MANTRI, JALGAON