KISAN RAGHUNATH NANAWARE,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 329/PUN/2014[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2018AY 2002-03
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 329/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2002-03 Shri Kisan Raghunath Nanaware, New Market Yard, At & Post Nira, Tal. Purandar, Dist. Pune. Pan : Aeupn7689E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3), Pune. ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Achal Sharma, Addl. CIT
Section 143(2)Section 153A
house property, the CIT(A) observed that the Assessing Officer had
considered additional evidences and upheld the addition earlier made. The CIT(A) also
held that the assessment order passed was not barred by limitation.
12. The assessee is in appeal against the order of CIT(A).
13. The Ld. AR for the assessee pointed out that the Authorities below