Search: house property

8 results for “house property”+ Section 801B(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai110 Rajkot22 Delhi21 Hyderabad16 Ahmedabad14 Indore11 Bangalore10 Pune8 Jaipur5 Cochin3 Kolkata2 Karnataka1 Jodhpur1 Raipur1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 80I32 Deduction8 Section 801B(10)5 Section 143(2)5 Section 143(3)4 Addition to Income4 Section 2503 Section 133(1)(d)2 Section 1432 Section 32

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 230/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal

Section 32Section 80I

section 32 of the Act. The appellant be granted just and proper relief in this respect. 6. The appellant prays to be allowed to add, amend, modify, rectify, delete, raise any grounds of appeal at the time of hearing.” 3. Shri Neelesh Khandelwal appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the assessee is a builder and developer. During

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee are allowed

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

M/S. COSMOPOLIS CONSTRUCTION,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1),, PUNE

M/S. CITY CORPORATION LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE

M/S. CITY CORPORATION LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE vs. MS S S LANDMARKS, PUNE

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. MS S S LANDMARKS, PUNE

SKYLINE DEVELOPERS,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD4(50, PUNE

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. VARUN DEVELOPERS,, PUNE