BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai80Chandigarh48Delhi27Bangalore11Chennai10Cochin8Cuttack7Jaipur6Visakhapatnam5Hyderabad5Pune4Amritsar1Lucknow1Allahabad1Raipur1SC1Indore1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 5727Section 54F7Capital Gains4Deduction4Addition to Income4Section 563

RAJENDRA L.AGARWAL,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -I),, PUNE

ITA 2330/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2330/Pun/2017 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Sunil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar &
Section 54F

Housing Society. It is undisputed fact. Therefore, 10 Shri Rajendra L. Agarwal we are of the opinion that in principle, the claim of the assessee should be allowed on the enhancement which was considered by the AO. However, the same is subject to the verification of the evidence and documents filed by assessee before the Assessing Officer during remand proceedings

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1313/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Pune
06 Feb 2020
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sanghamitra Khobragade
Section 56Section 57

56 to 58 of the Act and the claim of bad and doubtful debts is not covered under the provisions of sec. 57(iii) of the Act. The A.O after considering the provisions of sec. 57(iii) had disallowed the claim of bad and doubtful debts debt against the income from other sources being not eligible expenses. Feeling aggrieved

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, PUNE

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 681/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sanghamitra Khobragade
Section 56Section 57

56 to 58 of the Act and the claim of bad and doubtful debts is not covered under the provisions of sec. 57(iii) of the Act. The A.O after considering the provisions of sec. 57(iii) had disallowed the claim of bad and doubtful debts debt against the income from other sources being not eligible expenses. Feeling aggrieved

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1312/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sanghamitra Khobragade
Section 56Section 57

56 to 58 of the Act and the claim of bad and doubtful debts is not covered under the provisions of sec. 57(iii) of the Act. The A.O after considering the provisions of sec. 57(iii) had disallowed the claim of bad and doubtful debts debt against the income from other sources being not eligible expenses. Feeling aggrieved