Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Chandigarh49 Delhi27 Bangalore16 Chennai12 Cuttack10 Amritsar8 Cochin7 Visakhapatnam5 Hyderabad4 Pune4 Ahmedabad3 Kolkata3 Jaipur2 Lucknow1 J&K1 Allahabad1 Raipur1 SC1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 5727 Section 54F7 Capital Gains4 Deduction4 Addition to Income4 Section 563

RAJENDRA L.AGARWAL,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -I),, PUNE

ITA 2330/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2330/Pun/2017 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Sunil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar &

Section 54F

36 ITR 215 (SC). Further, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted the decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court is very much relevant in the instant case for the following legal propositions: “Expenditure incurred for getting shares registered in the name of the assessee and for conducting suits filed for amending the rules of the company

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1313/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed

RAJENDRA L.AGARWAL,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -I),, PUNE

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE

RAJENDRA L.AGARWAL,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -I),, PUNE

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, PUNE

KAVITA MANDAR BHAGWAT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4),, PUNE