BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore27Jaipur21Mumbai21Karnataka21Ahmedabad18Delhi9Visakhapatnam9Chennai8Cochin7Amritsar6Cuttack6Pune5Hyderabad4Kolkata2Guwahati2Surat2SC1Nagpur1Varanasi1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 271D9Section 271B6Section 269S6Section 273B5Section 44A5Section 271F5Penalty5Section 271(1)(b)3Section 1323Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1375/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh B. Budruk, Addl.CIT
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

273B, the Assessee had reasonable cause for accepting the cash from its customers. 8.2 Pertinently, the A.O. has not disputed any of the above basic facts. 8.3 The AO levied the penalty u/s. 271D by principally relying on the amendment made in section 194 IA vide the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019, wherein in the definition of the term 'consideration

MANISHA VIKRANT SHAH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12(1) PUNE, PUNE

2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1148/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri C.V. DespandeFor Respondent: Shri Pawan Bharati
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 27Section 271DSection 275(1)(c)

house property situated at Solapur was sold on 30.08.2016 for Rs.50,00,000/-. The cost of acquisition was stated to be Rs.53,00,000/-. The property was acquired on 16.02.2016. There was short term capital loss of Rs.3,00,000/-. Name of the purchaser, his PAN and his complete address was given. The three cheques drawn on Saraswat Bank bearing

USHA VITTHAL KHARATE,NASHIK vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1606/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: N O N EFor Respondent: Shri Prathamesh J. Lawand
Section 139(1)Section 271FSection 273B

House No. B-2, Vidya Nagar, Makhmalabad, Nashik – 422003 PAN : BGHPK9776M .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 3, Nashik ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee by : N O N E Revenue by : Shri Prathamesh J. Lawand सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 11-08-2020 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 11-08-2020 आदेश / ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA

SHIVPRASAD KASHINATH DESAI,SINDHUDURG vs. ITO WARD , KUDAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1003/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Prayag JhaFor Respondent: Shri Shashank Ojha
Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 273B

House No. 1358, Kudal Kalsewadu Banda, Sawantwadi, District Sindhudurga-416511, Maharashtra PAN: AJHPD0135H Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Prayag Jha Respondent by : Shri Shashank Ojha Date of hearing : 19.08.2025 Date of pronouncement : 12.09.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2016-17 is directed against the order dated

BENCHMARRK REALTY LLP,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

ITA 1396/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1396/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Benchmarrk Realty Llp, The Dcit, Circle-8, Pune. Sr.No.17/19, Near Balaji V Temple, Kate Wasti, Punawale, S Pune – 411033. Pan: Aanfb 7064 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 09/12/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/12/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-6, Pune Dated 25.07.2019 Emanating From Order Of Assessing Officer Dated 22.03.2018 Under Section 271B Of The Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2015- 16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 271BSection 273BSection 44A

273B of ITA, 1961. 4. The appellant craves leave to add / amend / alter / delete any of the above grounds of appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case as per the assessment order, are that the assessee had filed return of income electronically for A.Y.2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.33,80,870/-.Assessee was in the business of Builder and developer