BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka435Mumbai233Delhi218Hyderabad65Jaipur51Bangalore46Chennai45Indore31Ahmedabad27Cuttack23Cochin21Kolkata19Calcutta17Chandigarh16Visakhapatnam13Pune7Surat5Guwahati5Lucknow4Telangana4Dehradun4Rajasthan4Agra3Amritsar2Nagpur2SC1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1Varanasi1Gauhati1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)9Section 12A8Section 54F4Section 2633Section 243Section 273Section 1483Exemption3Deduction3Section 269U

MICHELLE Y.POONAWALLA,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, 4 ,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 667/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Anurag Srivastava
Section 143(3)Section 23Section 24Section 263Section 269USection 27

house property and clause (iiib) of section 27 of the Act refers to section 269 UA of the Act. He referred

2
House Property2
Capital Gains2

RAGBIRSINGH MALIKSINGH RAJPAL,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1100/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: HeardITAT Pune04 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1100/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Babu
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194ISection 2Section 54FSection 56

house property’. In the absence of the same, the question which arises is whether the Assessing Officer has jurisdiction to reopen the assessment by issue of notice under section 148 of the Act. 11. The Pune Bench of Tribunal in the case of DDIT Vs. Sandvik AB (supra) has adjudicated similar issue of absence of tangible material in turn, relying

SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1552/PUN/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrashri Mukund Bhavan Trust Cit (Exemption), Pune 1105, Raviwar Peth, Mukund Vs. Bhavan, Pune – 411002 Pan: Aaats5170R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Mallikarjun Utture, Cit Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri V.L. JainFor Respondent: Shri Mallikarjun Utture, CIT
Section 12ASection 13(1)(a)

house hold activities), and Sannyasashram (renouncing material world), which is a materialistic arrangement for one social group to dominate another, and by reinforcing identity based on bodily categories. Thus, the entire concept itself is against the social development and not for any charity of the people at large at all. 2 Further verification shows that the Trust Deed contains

PUNE MATHADI HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS BOARD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1012/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1012/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Pune Mathadihamal & Other The Income Tax Manual Workers Board, V Officer, Shramashakti Bhavan, S Ward-5(1), Pune. Coomercial Plot No.1, Market Yard, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aaalp0097L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Vipul Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Shri Rajesh Gawali– Dr’S Date Of Hearing 17/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/06/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Orders Of Ld.Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Act Dated 14.07.2023 :

For Appellant: 2. The ld.AR submitted written submissions, relevant part of the same is reprodu
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250

sections 11 and 12 shall apply in respect of any income derived from property held under trust of any assessment year preceding the aforesaid assessment year, for which assessment proceedings are pending before the Assessing Officer as on the date of such registration and the objects and activities of such trust or institution remain the same for such preceding assessment

ARCHANA PRASHANT DATE,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD 11(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 190/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Ms.Astha Chandra

For Respondent: Appellant by Shri Sarang Gudhate
Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 250Section 48Section 50CSection 54

269 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication in light of judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. reported in (1987) 2 SCC 107 and in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 21.03.2025 (2025 INSC

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHRI RANJIT HANMANTRAO MOHITE,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1253/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav BathamFor Respondent: Shri Sanket Joshi
Section 143(3)

property or investments does not amount to a business. A person, who merely invests in shares for the purpose of earning dividends, does not carry on business. However, it is important to remember that the definition of ‘business’ in section 2(13) is inclusive and includes ‘adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture’. Though a single

REHAU POLYMERS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

ITA 658/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Hitendra B Ninawe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

house. It was submitted that these services pertained to the internal systems and processes of the Rehau Group. It was submitted that the assessee has received various benefits by receipt of these services as without receiving such services, the assessee could not have carried out its business operations successfully in India, since Rehau India depends solely on technical support