YOGITA MANOJ TATOOSKAR,PUNE vs. ITO 12(1), PUNE
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 2714/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Jan 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2714/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Yogita Manoj Tatooskar, V The Income Tax Officer, 504, Anandban, Chs, Ashok S Ward-12(1), Pune. Path, Maharashtra – 411004. Pan: Abopt9276A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Nikhil S Pathak – Ar Miss Indira R Adkil – Add.Cit(Dr) Revenue By Date Of Hearing 27/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28/01/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2012-13; Dated 28.10.2024; Emanating From Assessment Order Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15.11.2013. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Of The Assessee On The Ground That The Appellant Had Failed To Submit The
Section 143(1)Section 250
House Property of Rs.1,30,752/-, but CPC enhanced it to
ITA No.2714/PUN/2024 [A]
Rs.9,73,010/-. Aggrieved by the order under section 143(1),
Assessee filed appeal before the ld.CIT(A). Ld.AR took us through the order passed by ld.CIT(A) to demonstrate the documents filed by Assessee before ld.CIT(A), which has been reproduced by the ld.CIT
