KISAN RAGHUNATH NANAWARE,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 329/PUN/2014[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2018AY 2002-03
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 329/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2002-03 Shri Kisan Raghunath Nanaware, New Market Yard, At & Post Nira, Tal. Purandar, Dist. Pune. Pan : Aeupn7689E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3), Pune. ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Achal Sharma, Addl. CIT
Section 143(2)Section 153A
unexplained investment in house property.
The ground of appeal No. 7 is interlinked with ground of appeal No. 6. Vide ground of
appeal No. 8, the assessee is aggrieved by addition of Rs. 84,000/- and vide ground of
appeal No. 9 by addition of Rs.1,36,439/-. The issue raised in ground of appeal No. 10 is
against charging
