DCIT, CIRCLE 8 PUNE, PUNE vs. ALFA LAVAL INDIA PVT LTD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

section 40(a)(ia). He\nfurther submitted that from the books of account of the asssessee it was established\nthat these were actual expenses incurred during AY 2017-18 and not the\n\"provisions for expenses” on which TDS was not deducted. He submitted that the\nassessee failed to furnish any documentary evidence that TDS was deducted during\nthe assessment

NELSON GLOBAL PRODUCTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE, MAHARAHSTRA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

section 37 of the Act: Erred on the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law by confirming the disallowance for the warranty expenses amounting to Rs.12,32,732 without appreciating the fact that these are actual settlement of warranty expenses with the customers of the Appellant. Erred on the facts in circumstances of the case

PRASANNA SADASHIV SHETE,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2012-13 Prasanna Sadashiv Shete Dcit, Circle 10, Pune 56/8, D-Ii, Midc Shete Industries, Vs. Chinchwad, Pune – 411019 Pan: Adbps4462Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Suhas Bora Department By : Shri Arvind Desai, Addl Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 27-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-05-2025 O R D E R

88,783/- (b) Disallowance u/s 14A Rs. 20,550/- (c) Disallowance of wages and labour charges Rs. 1,48,985/- Rs.38,58,318/- Total 4. Since the assessee filed the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC with a delay of 34 and ½ months from the service of the assessment order, the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal

ARMED FORCES EX OFFICERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCIER, ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEP, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

ARMED FORCES EX OFFICERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOC,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCIER, NFAC, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

ARMED FORCES EX OFFCIERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOC,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFCIER, NFAC, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

ARMED FORCES EX OFFICERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

ARMED FORCES EX OFFICERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E- ASSESSMENT CENTR, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

ARMED FORCES EX OFFICERS MULTI SERVICES CO OPERATIVE SOC,PUNE, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2344 To 2348/Pun/2024 & "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 To 2016-17, 2018-19, 2020-21 & 2017-18 Armed Forces Ex Officers Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Multi Services Co-Operative Nfac. Soc, 364, Likmanya Tilak Sabha Griha, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aaaaa1185H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Shweta Joshi - Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde - Dr

disallowing the claim of deduction made under section 80P(2)(d) of INR 1,88,32,471 The Learned Assessing

PRABHAT GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PATNSANSTHA MARYADIT TADWADI,RAIGAD vs. ITO, WARD 3, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

disallowed the deduction u/s 80P. it is seen that the due date of filing return for the assessee was 31.10.2017 whereas the return was filed on 31.03.2018. The assessee is registered under Maharashtra Co-operative Act 1960, having total receipts of Rs.44,88,175/-only. The provisions of section

KIRLOSKAR OIL ENGINE EMPLOYEES CO- OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE-2, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

disallowing deduction under Section 80(P)(2)(a)(i) for interest income earned from other co-op bank which is attributable to the main activity of the assessee. 4. The appellant prays for the order passed u/s 263 by Learned PCIT is to be quashed. 2 2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that this matter

ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , PANVEL vs. EPYGEN BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

disallowance of capital expenditure related to scientific research amounting to Rs.3,72,88,916 under Section 35(1)(iv) of the Act, the appellant

DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, SWARGATE vs. ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.133/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.66/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vs. Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing 14.11.2024 : Date Of Pronouncement : 24.12.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Dated 24.11.2023 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)-13, Pune [‘Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. First, We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.133/Pun/2024 For Adjudication.

disallowance of expenses on account of leasehold improvements of Rs.4,40,88,288/- was confirmed by observing as under :- “3.3 I have carefully considered the submission of the appellant in light of the facts of the case. The appellant has stated that it had taken on lease the office space at “wing A, upper Ground floor, Tower VIII, Magarpatta City

ENTRATA INDIA PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.133/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.66/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1(1), Pune. Vs. Entrata India Pvt. Ltd., International Tech Park, Block-1, Wing-A, 14Th Floor, Kharadi, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaacw7089A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing 14.11.2024 : Date Of Pronouncement : 24.12.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Dated 24.11.2023 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)-13, Pune [‘Cit(A)’] For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. First, We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.133/Pun/2024 For Adjudication.

disallowance of expenses on account of leasehold improvements of Rs.4,40,88,288/- was confirmed by observing as under :- “3.3 I have carefully considered the submission of the appellant in light of the facts of the case. The appellant has stated that it had taken on lease the office space at “wing A, upper Ground floor, Tower VIII, Magarpatta City

AMJ LAND HOLDINGS LTD.,PUNE vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2021-22 Amj Land Holdings Limited Asst. Director Of Income Tax, Vs. Thergaon, Pune – 411033 Cpc, Bengaluru Pan: Aabcp0310Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S Pathak Department By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 05-05-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 07-05-2025 O R D E R

88,554/-. The assessee also declared u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) a total book profit income of Rs.6,74,73,924/- with a tax payable thereon at Rs.1,12,62,748/-. While processing the return, the CPC disallowed an amount of Rs.64,469/- out of Rs.2,28,590/- against the payment

MAHATMA GANDHI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MYDT UDGIR,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- WARD 1 -LATUR, LATUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

88,392 from investments in Co-\noperative and a show cause notice was issued as to why the said interest\nincome claimed as deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i)/80(P(2)(d) of the Act\nbe not disallowed

DESAI INFRA PROJECTS(I) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. PCIT, CENTRAL PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

disallowance u/s. 36(1)(va) for delay in deposit of employees contribution to PF. 10. We find that the provision of Section 263 of the Act has direct bearing on the issue raised before us, therefore, it is pertinent to take note of this section which reads as under: "263(1) The Commissioner may call for and examine the record

DCIT CIRCLE-1, NASHIK vs. JYOTI PAPER UDYOG LIMITED, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

disallowance made by the AOunder Section 144 r/w Section\n8(2)(iii) of IncomeTax Rules for a sum of Rs.14,88

INCOME TAX OFFICER , JALNA vs. VIKRAM TEA PROCESSOR PRIVATE LIMITED , JALNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2013-14

disallowance made by the AO under section 14A r/w section 8(2)(iii) of Income Tax Rules for a sum Rs.14,88