Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80G(5)(ix)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27 Delhi21 Bangalore15 Ahmedabad11 Rajkot8 Indore3 Kolkata3 Lucknow3 Pune2 Jaipur2 Chandigarh2 Surat1 Hyderabad1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80G8 Section 12A7 Section 80G(2)(a)3 Section 37(1)2 Addition to Income2

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1096/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Siddhesh Chaugule &For Respondent: Shri Manish M. Mehta

Section 135Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(1)(ii)Section 80G(2)(a)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G of the Act. 3) The appellant craves to add, amend, alter or delete any of the above ground of appeal during the course of appellate proceedings before the Hon'ble Tribunal.” 5. The Ld. DR relied on the order of the Ld. AO. The Ld. DR admitted that the impugned issue is covered in favour of the assessee

AIDS SOCIETY OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE

ITA 417/PUN/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Mar 2025

For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari

80G of the Act.”\n2.19 Similar view was taken by Hon'ble Allahbad High Court in case of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Educational Society vs CIT(Exemptions) that,\n“Withdrawal of registration granted to assessee-society under section 12AA was justified where its activities were not genuine nor was it run as per objective set out in memorandum”\n2.20 Further