Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai22 Delhi21 Bangalore10 Jaipur9 Kolkata7 Agra6 Pune4 Ahmedabad4 Karnataka4 Indore4 Rajkot3 Jodhpur2 Chennai2 Hyderabad1 Nagpur1 Cuttack1 Raipur1 Amritsar1 SC1 Surat1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 54B14 Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 44A6 Deduction4 Section 2503 Business Income3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay3

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

In the result, all the appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1837/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sarang Gudhate, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Tripathi, Addl.CIT

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 54B

54D, 54G and 54GA & Large Investment in property (AIR) as compared to total income". However, Ld Assessing Officer has travelled beyond the scope of limited scrutiny by reclassifying the nature of income and making an addition under the head "Business Income", which is contrary to the scope of enquiry permitted under the limited scrutiny guidelines. Hence addition is not sustainable

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

TULSABAI VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

ROHINI MARUTI DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

BHANUDAS VITTHAL MHASURKAR,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), PUNE, PUNE