BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai69Karnataka51Delhi27Chennai16Telangana15Bangalore13Kolkata9Jaipur5Ahmedabad3Hyderabad3Pune3SC3Surat3Visakhapatnam2Rajkot1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 2633Section 143(2)3Section 43D3Section 43B3Deduction3Addition to Income3Set Off of Losses3

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 802/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

section 43C of the Income-tax Act on the scheduled bank.\n11. Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue placed reliance on the\njudgment in the case of Southern Technologies Ltd. (supra). However, this\njudgment pertains to non-banking financial companies. UCO Bank's case\n(supra) and Mercantile Bank Ltd. (supra) case squarely applies to the facts\nof the present

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 801/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

section 43C of the Income-tax\nAct on the scheduled bank.\n11. Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue placed reliance on the judgment\nin the case of Southern Technologies Ltd. (supra). However, this judgment\npertains to non-banking financial companies. UCO Bank's case (supra) and\nMercantile Bank Ltd. (supra) case squarely applies to the facts of the present case

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 800/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

section 43C of the Income-tax Act on the scheduled bank.\n11. Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue placed reliance on the\njudgment in the case of Southern Technologies Ltd. (supra). However, this\njudgment pertains to non-banking financial companies. UCO Bank's case\n(supra) and Mercantile Bank Ltd. (supra) case squarely applies to the facts\nof the present