M/S. RAJMAL LAKHICHAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

section 2(22)(e) of the Act are not attracted. 3.8 In respect of ground No. 5 regarding disallowance of interest of Rs.3,08,889/- u/s. 36

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. RAJMAL LAKHICHAND,,

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

section 2(22)(e) of the Act are not attracted. 3.8 In respect of ground No. 5 regarding disallowance of interest of Rs.3,08,889/- u/s. 36

AHMEDNAGAR ZILLA GRAMSEVAKANCHI SAHAKAR PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,AHILYANAGAR vs. PCIT, PUNE-1, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

36 (Kerala) vide order dated\n04.09.2024 has held as under :\nQuote \"7. On a consideration of the rival submissions, we are of the\nview that for the reasons stated hereinafter, the question of law that\narises for consideration before us must be answered against the\nRevenue and in favour of the assessee. The permissible deduction\nthat is envisaged under Section

SWARAJ EXCELLENT MANPOWER FACILITIES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE, 10, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

THE RESIDENCY CLUB,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2, , KOLHAPUR

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

V D M-POWER P LTD,AURANGABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1,, AURANGABAD

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

VARAD CROP SCIENCE PRIVATE LIMITED,JALNA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SEEMA SANTOSH GHONE,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

YASHWANT FORGINGS P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SEEMA SANTOSH GHONE,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

VARAD CROP SCIENCE PRIVATE LIMITED,JALNA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SATISH MADHAORAO YEOLE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(4), , PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

RAJDEEP INFO TECHNO P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SARIKA VIKRAM WARPE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD 7(3), , PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SIXSIGMA MEDICARE AND RESEARCH LTD.,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

ZAWARE CREATIVE ENTERPRISES P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

SUBHASH SAKHARAM MORE,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE /DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CPC), BENGALURU, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2

WONDER CARS P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

disallowed by the Revenue under section 36(1)(va) of the Act while processing the return of income under secretion 143(1)of the Act. 2