Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

292 results for “disallowance”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,251 Mumbai827 Kolkata553 Bangalore442 Chennai406 Jaipur300 Pune292 Ahmedabad225 Chandigarh188 Hyderabad179 Raipur128 Indore119 Nagpur85 Surat79 Visakhapatnam70 Agra66 Amritsar59 Lucknow59 Cuttack49 Guwahati47 Jodhpur41 Cochin39 Rajkot27 Jabalpur18 Ranchi15 Karnataka15 Varanasi12 Patna9 Panaji8 Dehradun7 Allahabad5 SC5 Telangana4 Rajasthan3 Calcutta2 Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)180 Section 143(1)115 Section 139(1)107 Disallowance96 Addition to Income72 Section 43B67 Deduction66 Section 13948 Section 25037 Section 143(3)

VIRENDRA SINGH SAINI,HARYANA vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE, BENGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1483/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Pune19 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1483/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.S.Rajpurohit

Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SURIA STEELTECH PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS TMS ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED),PUNE vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, WARD-9(4), PUNE, PUNE

Showing 1–20 of 292 · Page 1 of 15

...

25

Section 143(1)(a)23

Limitation/Time-bar7

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 547/PUN/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri Shashank Deogadkar

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SEEMA SANTOSH GHONE,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 116/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SARIKA VIKRAM WARPE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD 7(3), , PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 54/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

V D M-POWER P LTD,AURANGABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1,, AURANGABAD

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 105/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SEEMA SANTOSH GHONE,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 115/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

RAJDEEP INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 294/PUN/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

M/S. THAKKER DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 179/PUN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SUBHASH SAKHARAM MORE,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE /DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CPC), BENGALURU, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 386/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SWARAJ EXCELLENT MANPOWER FACILITIES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE, 10, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 88/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

ZAWARE CREATIVE ENTERPRISES P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 20/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

YASHWANT FORGINGS P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SR FIBREGLASS AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED,NASHIK vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 193/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SATISH MADHAORAO YEOLE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(4), , PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 107/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

RAJDEEP INFO TECHNO P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 268/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SIXSIGMA MEDICARE AND RESEARCH LTD.,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC,, BENGALURU

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 322/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SWARAJ EXCELLENT MANPOWER FACILITIES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE, 10, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 89/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

SAPRE AUTO ANCILLARIES,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE -1, KOLHAPUR

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 281/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

RAJDEEP INFO TECHNO P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 267/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit

WONDER CARS P LTD,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 55/PUN/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

section 36(1)(va)’, it is an apparent indication of the disallowance of expenditure u/s 36(1)(va) in the audit