Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai63 Bangalore54 Delhi50 Kolkata34 Ahmedabad23 Jaipur12 Chandigarh10 Chennai8 Lucknow7 Panaji5 Rajkot4 Ranchi3 Hyderabad2 Cuttack2 Pune2 Raipur2 SC1 Nagpur1 Agra1 Visakhapatnam1 Surat1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 271C11 Section 273B3 Section 9(1)(vi)2 Section 2012 Deduction2 Penalty2 TDS2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., (FORMERLY: BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LTD.,),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of Revenue and Cross Objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 356/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.356/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Kirit Kamdar

Section 201Section 271C

disallowable under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. He also pointed out that in case appeal of Revenue is dismissed, then the Cross Objections filed by the assessee would become infructuous. 11. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The issue which arises in the present appeal is against penalty levied under section 271C

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TETRA PAK INDIA PRIVATE LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed