BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 244A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai313Delhi223Bangalore90Ahmedabad48Kolkata29Cochin28Jaipur25Chennai18Allahabad16Chandigarh9Hyderabad8Indore7Rajkot5Lucknow5Pune5Dehradun2Patna2Cuttack2Ranchi2Karnataka2Telangana1Guwahati1Jodhpur1Amritsar1Panaji1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)9Section 2505Section 244A3Section 36(1)(va)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 270A2Section 139(1)2Section 2(22)(e)2Transfer Pricing

KHANDESH BUILDERS LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 268/PUN/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Mar 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.268/Pun/2015 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Khandesh Builders Ltd., 7, Shivaji Nagar, Jalgaon – 425 001. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan: Aaack 8222 H बनाम / V/S. The Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax, ……""यथ" / Respondent Circle-1, Jalgaon.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil GanooFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg & Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 2(22)(e)Section 234B

2 Khandesh Builders Ltd., (A) Pvt. Ltd. & the credit amounts are utilized by the appellant company for its business & for discharging its trading liabilities. 10) In the facts, circumstances & position of law learned CIT Appeals-II, Nashik erred in holding that provisions of section 234B, 244A & 234D are applicable in the appellant’s case as the demand has arisen

2
Penalty2
Comparables/TP2

M/S. FIS SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT.LTD, (FROMERLY KNOWN AS SUNGARD SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT.LTD,),PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1695/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Mar 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1695/Pun/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Fis Solutions (India) Private Limited. Formerly Known As Sungard Solutions (India) Private Limited. Westend Centre One, Survey No. 169/1, Sector Ii, Aundh, Pune-411 007. Pan : Aaace7476K .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Gautam JainFor Respondent: Shri T.V. Bhaskar Reddy, CIT
Section 144C(5)

2) as per law. For this purpose the orders to that extent are set aside for re- doing the same as per facts and provisions of law.” 28.1 This judgment was further relied upon by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Bangalore in the case of Lam Research (India) Private Limited Vs. DCIT, ITA No.1437/Bang/2014 & ITA No.1385/Bang/2014

KUMAR AGRO PRODUCTS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 14(4),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 316/PUN/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.316/Pun/2021 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Kumar Agro Products Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Ltd., Vs Of Income Tax, Circle-14, 2413, 1St Floor, Kumar Pune. Capital, East Street, Camp, Pune – 411001. Pan: Aaack 7660 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Agiwal – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 13/09/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/09/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assesseeisdirected Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[(Nfac)], Delhi Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Dated 19.07.2021. The Assessee Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Erred In Upholding Action Of The Learned Ao In The Assessing Total Loss To Rs. 4,79,85,807 As Against Returned Loss Of Rs. 4,83,21,611;

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 250Section 270ASection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Disallowance of Rs. 3,35,804 under section 36(1)(va) of the Act, on account of delayed payment of employees contribution to Provident Fund/Employees State Insurance Corporation (PF / ESIC) ITA No.316/PUN/2021 for A.Y. 2017-18 Kumar Agro Products Pvt. Ltd.,[A] 2. erred in upholding the addition made by the learned AO in respect of employee’s contribution made

TRUMPF (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 14(5), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1448/PUN/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jul 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1448/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11 Trumpf (India) Private Limited, V The Income Tax Officer, Raisoni Industrial Park, S. Ward-14(5), Pune. S.No.276, Hissa No.1, Village Mann, Taluka – Mulshi, Pune – 411057. Maharashtra. Pan: Aacct8008J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Abdulkadir Jawadwala– Ar(Virtual) Revenue By Shri Akhilesh Srivastva – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 10/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16/07/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: The Assessee Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of Ld.Addl./Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)-12, Delhi Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 25.03.2025 For A.Y.2010-11, Emanating From The Order U/S.143(3) Of The Act, Dated 03.11.2024. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 143(3)Section 234CSection 250Section 271

disallowing employee's contribution towards Provident Fund. 7. Initiation of penalty proceedings : The learned DCIT erred in law and on the facts and in circumstances of the case in proposing to initiate penalty proceedings section 271 of the Act without considering the facts of the case. 8. Levy of interest obligation: The learned DCIT has erred on the facts

PROCESSIA PLM PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2007/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2007/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Processia Plm Private Vs. Income Tax Department, Limited, National E-Assessment First Floor, Office No.102, Centre, Delhi. Amar Apex Building, Amar Apex Condominium, Baner, Pune-411045. Pan : Aaact6811H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Nidhi Agarwal (Virtual) Revenue By : Shri Harshit Bari Date Of Hearing : 17.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 05.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 12.06.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “Ground No. 1: On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Order Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 ('The Act') Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) ['Ld. Cit(A)'] On 12 June 2025 Is Bad In Law.

For Appellant: Ms. Nidhi Agarwal (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Harshit Bari
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 244ASection 250

2: On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, in the order under section 250 of the Act, the Ld CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of credit of taxes deducted at source amounting to INR 15,18,619 made by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi ('Learned AO') in the assessment order dated