BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

78 results for “disallowance”+ Section 198clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi759Mumbai729Kolkata251Bangalore249Ahmedabad163Chennai155Jaipur138Hyderabad99Pune78Chandigarh61Lucknow48Raipur47Surat40Calcutta34Cochin33Visakhapatnam28Indore26Rajkot24Cuttack20Karnataka16Guwahati15Nagpur10SC10Allahabad7Amritsar6Jodhpur6Jabalpur5Rajasthan4Ranchi4Varanasi4Telangana4Dehradun3Patna3Himachal Pradesh2Panaji1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)75Addition to Income58Section 14A50Section 12A41Section 1135Section 115B33Disallowance33Section 14832Section 14728Section 10(20)

AJINKYA ELECTROMELT PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1828/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Mar 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1828/Pun/2017 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Ajinkya Electromelt Pvt. Ltd., Khandelwal Jain & Associates, 1St Floor, Alankar Cinema Building, Above United Bank, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411001 …. Pan: Aabca5142M Vs.

For Appellant: Shri R.G. NaharFor Respondent: Shri Achal Sharma, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

198/- and under Rules 8D(iii) of the Rules at ₹ 1,07,501/-, total disallowance being ₹ 1,20,33,699/-. 5. The CIT(A) upheld the order of Assessing Officer on the ground that the ratio laid down by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. (supra) was while deciding the matter under section

Showing 1–20 of 78 · Page 1 of 4

24
Deduction22
Exemption20

SAI SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1075/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1074 & 1075/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sai Service Private Limited, Dcit, Circle-10, Mumbai Pune Road, Vs Pune Phugewadi, Pune 411 012 Maharashtra Pan : Aabcs4998M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Smt. Deepa Khare– Ar Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak- Dr Date Of Hearing 22/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) In The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Passed U/S.250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) On 04.09.2023 & 18.09.2023 Respectively For Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19. Since Some Grounds Of Appeal Are Common In All These Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of These Appeals By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience. We Are Discussing A.Y.2017-18 Hereonwards.

Section 10Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 80G

Section 80AC does not apply to deductions u/s 80G of the Act and hence the Assessee can claim the deduction u/s 80G even if not claimed in the return of income. Therefore, respectfully following the order in the case of Sai Services Agency (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd., ITA 490/PUN/2021, we direct the AO to verify the claim of the Assessee

SAI SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED ,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1074/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1074 & 1075/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sai Service Private Limited, Dcit, Circle-10, Mumbai Pune Road, Vs Pune Phugewadi, Pune 411 012 Maharashtra Pan : Aabcs4998M Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Smt. Deepa Khare– Ar Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak- Dr Date Of Hearing 22/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals) In The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Passed U/S.250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) On 04.09.2023 & 18.09.2023 Respectively For Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19. Since Some Grounds Of Appeal Are Common In All These Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of These Appeals By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience. We Are Discussing A.Y.2017-18 Hereonwards.

Section 10Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 80G

Section 80AC does not apply to deductions u/s 80G of the Act and hence the Assessee can claim the deduction u/s 80G even if not claimed in the return of income. Therefore, respectfully following the order in the case of Sai Services Agency (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd., ITA 490/PUN/2021, we direct the AO to verify the claim of the Assessee

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. SKODA AUTO A.S.,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 787/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.787/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Ms. Divya Bajpai, CITFor Respondent: S/Shri Nikhil Pathak &
Section 10Section 143(3)

disallowance of ₹ 1,90,48,294/- claimed under section 10(6A) of the Act. The Revenue is aggrieved by non-fulfillment of conditions by the assessee, wherein for claiming the benefit under the said section, payment made in pursuance to the agreement was to be approved by the Govt. of India and in the case of assessee, approval granted

TETRA PAK INDIA PRIVATE LTD.,,PUNE vs. DY.CIT, CIR.7, PUNE, PUNE

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/PUN/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.111/Pun/2011 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07 Tetra Pak India Private Ltd., Mayfair Towers, Wakdewadi, Shivajinagar, Pune-411005. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaact3467B बनाम / V/S. Dcit, Circle-7, ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri Nikhil Pathak Revenue By : Shri S. B. Prasad सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02.07.2019 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 27.08.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of Assessing Officer/Tpo/Drp For The Assessment Year 2006-07. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :- “Based On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Tetra Pak India Private Limited (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Appellant’) Respectfully Craves Leave To Prefer An Appeal Under Section 253(1)(D) Of The Income- Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Act’), Against The Order Dated 25 November 2010 Passed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax- Circle 7 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Assessing Officer’) Under Section 143(3) Read With Section 144C(13) Of The Act In Pursuance Of The Directions Dated 20 September 2010 Issued By The Honorable Dispute Resolution Panel (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Honorable Drp’), On The Following Grounds: On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Honorable Drp & Consequentially The Learned Ao Have: I Grounds Of Objections In Respect Of Transfer Pricing Adjustment

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri S. B. Prasad
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 253(1)(d)

section 92C(2) of the Act of adopting as arm’s length price, a price which varies by not more than 5 per cent from the arm’s length price. II. Grounds of objections in respect of disallowances/ additions other than transfer pricing adjustment 14. Disallowance of Incremental provision for warranty of Rs.10,198

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 607/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.549 & 550/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rajshekhar S. AbhyankarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 35

section 115JA of the Act. Accordingly, Ground No.11 by the assessee is allowed. 17. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 34 Serum Institute of India Ltd., A.Yrs. 2011-12 and 2012-13 ITA No.550/PUN/2016 – By Assessee A.Y. 2012-13 18. Grounds raised by the Assessee read as under : “On the facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 934/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.549 & 550/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rajshekhar S. AbhyankarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 35

section 115JA of the Act. Accordingly, Ground No.11 by the assessee is allowed. 17. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 34 Serum Institute of India Ltd., A.Yrs. 2011-12 and 2012-13 ITA No.550/PUN/2016 – By Assessee A.Y. 2012-13 18. Grounds raised by the Assessee read as under : “On the facts

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 549/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.549 & 550/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rajshekhar S. AbhyankarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 35

section 115JA of the Act. Accordingly, Ground No.11 by the assessee is allowed. 17. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 34 Serum Institute of India Ltd., A.Yrs. 2011-12 and 2012-13 ITA No.550/PUN/2016 – By Assessee A.Y. 2012-13 18. Grounds raised by the Assessee read as under : “On the facts

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 550/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.549 & 550/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rajshekhar S. AbhyankarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 35

section 115JA of the Act. Accordingly, Ground No.11 by the assessee is allowed. 17. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 34 Serum Institute of India Ltd., A.Yrs. 2011-12 and 2012-13 ITA No.550/PUN/2016 – By Assessee A.Y. 2012-13 18. Grounds raised by the Assessee read as under : “On the facts

MANILAL MALASHIBHAL GADA,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT EPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 192/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Ghai
Section 14ASection 234ASection 57

disallowed interest expenditure to the tune of Rs.16,91,198/- invoking the provisions of section 57(iii) of the Act. The Assessing

RAMESH G PORWAL,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1727/PUN/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: Shri R.G. NaharFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Vivek Aggarwal
Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance so made be deleted. Just in proper relief be granted to the appellant on this score.” 3. Before us, Ld. AR submitted that the assessee does not wish to press ground No.5 and therefore the ground No.5 is dismissed as not pressed. 4. 1st ground is with respect to treating the income as business income as against it treatment

ATLAS COPCO (INDIA) LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and that

ITA 345/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.302/Pun/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Circle-8, Atlas Copco (India) Limited, Pune Vs. Mumbai-Pune Road, Dapodi, Pune – 411 012 Pan : Aaaca4074D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 92C

section 92C, the other method for determination of the arms’ length price in relation to an international transaction or a specified domestic transaction shall be any method which takes into account the price which has been charged or paid, or would have been charged or paid, for the same or similar uncontrolled transaction, with or between non- associated enterprises, under

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. ATLAS COPCO (INDIA) LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and that

ITA 302/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.302/Pun/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Dcit, Circle-8, Atlas Copco (India) Limited, Pune Vs. Mumbai-Pune Road, Dapodi, Pune – 411 012 Pan : Aaaca4074D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 92C

section 92C, the other method for determination of the arms’ length price in relation to an international transaction or a specified domestic transaction shall be any method which takes into account the price which has been charged or paid, or would have been charged or paid, for the same or similar uncontrolled transaction, with or between non- associated enterprises, under

M/S GIRIRAJ ENTERPRISES,PUNE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 427/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 10(35)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

disallowed / taxed accordingly as per computation as under: Particulars Amount (in Rs.) Redeemed Value of MF on 29.01.2015 8,99,93,198/- Add: Dividend Received 2,06,68,835/- Business Loss claimed 1,00,06,802/- 10 IT(SS)A Nos.23 to 25/PUN/2024 Total Receipts 12,06,68,835/- Less: Initial Investment Cost 10,00,00,000/- Income earned

REINSHAW METRLOGY SYSTEMS LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5, PUNE

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1560/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm आयकरअपऩलसं. / Ita No.1560/Pun/2017 निर्धारणवषा / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Renishaw Metrology Systems Limited, The D.C.I.T., S.No. 283, Hissa No. 2, S.No. 284, Vs Circle-5, Hissa No. 2 & 3A, Raisoni Estate, Pune. Village Mann Taluka, Mulshi, District- Pune 411057. Pan No. Aabcr6361F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Ajit Jain-Ar (Through Virtual) Revenue By Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav-Dr (Through Virtual) Date Of Hearing 29/03/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 01/04/2022 आदेश/ Order Per:Shri Sonjoy Sarma, J.M. This Appeal By The Assessee Arises Out Of The Order Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-13, Pune,(In Short, The Cit(A) In Relation To The Assessment Order Dated 23/03/2016 Passed By Dcit, Circle-5, Pune For The Assessment Year 2012-13.The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: “On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Transfer Pricing Officer (Tpo)/Assessing Officer (Ao) Has Erred & The Hon/ Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Cit(A)) Has Further Erred In Upholding/Confirming The Action Of The Ld. Tpo/Ao In: 1 Transfer Pricing General Ground 1.1 Making An Addition To The Appellant’S Total Income Based On The Provisions Of Chapter X Of The Act & Have Further Erred In Fact & In Law In Not Providing Any Reasons To Show That The Conditions Mentioned In Clauses (A) To (D) Of Section 92C(3) Of The

Section 92C(3)Section 92D

Section 271(1)(c) of the Act on the premise that the Appellant has concealed/furnished inaccurate particulars of income, without appreciating the fact that adjustment made is not in accordance with the law. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, vary, omit, substitute or amend the above grounds of appeal, at any time before or at the time of hearing

ATLAS COPCO (INDIA) LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 816/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1356/Pun/2015 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Atlas Copco (India) Limited Sevanagar, Mumbai-Pune Road, Dapodi, Pune-411 012. Pan : Aaaca4074D .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Murlidhar
Section 40

198/- towards Software development expenses. The Assessing Officer treated the same as capital in A.Ys.2010-11 & 2011-12 nature. After allowing depreciation of Rs.4,68,039/- @30% (half of 60%), the Assessing Officer made net addition of Rs.10,92,139/-. When the matter came up before the Tribunal for consideration, the assessee did not press this ground. Ex consequenti

ATLAS COPCO (INDIA) LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1356/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1356/Pun/2015 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Atlas Copco (India) Limited Sevanagar, Mumbai-Pune Road, Dapodi, Pune-411 012. Pan : Aaaca4074D .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Murlidhar
Section 40

198/- towards Software development expenses. The Assessing Officer treated the same as capital in A.Ys.2010-11 & 2011-12 nature. After allowing depreciation of Rs.4,68,039/- @30% (half of 60%), the Assessing Officer made net addition of Rs.10,92,139/-. When the matter came up before the Tribunal for consideration, the assessee did not press this ground. Ex consequenti

EKNATH DHONDIRAM MITHE,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 501/PUN/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.501/Pun/2021 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Eknath Dhondiram Mithe, Acit, Cpc. Flat No.1, Shraddha Residency, Vs 198, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad. Maharashtra – 431001. Pan: Abypm 6431 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 27/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/06/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre(Nfac), Delhi Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Also Called As ‘The Act’) In Relation To The Assessment Year 2018-19 Dated 31.08.2021. 2. The Only Issue Raised In This Appeal Is Against The Confirmation Of Disallowance Of Rs.3,96,531/- Made By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Act On Account Of Late Deposit Of The Employees’ Share Of Epf & Esi Etc.

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

198, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad. Maharashtra – 431001. PAN: ABYPM 6431 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Deepa Khare – AR Revenue by Shri S P Walimbe – DR Date of hearing 27/06/2022 Date of pronouncement 29/06/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC

MACHINDRA EKNATH MITTHE,AURANGABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 504/PUN/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.504/Pun/2021 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Machindra Eknath Mitthe, The Acit, Cpc, Bangalore 198, Shraddha Residency, Vs Prasad Netra Hospital, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad – 431001. Pan: Aofpm 9122 A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 27/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 28/06/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre(Nfac), Delhi Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Also Called As ‘The Act’) In Relation To The Assessment Year 2018-19 Dated 28.09.2021. 2. The Only Issue Raised In This Appeal Is Against The Confirmation Of Disallowance Of Rs.38,75,425/- Made By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 36(1)(Va) Of The Act On Account Of Late Deposit Of The Employees’ Share Of Epf & Esi Etc.

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

198, Shraddha Residency, Vs Prasad Netra Hospital, Samarth Nagar, Aurangabad – 431001. PAN: AOFPM 9122 A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Deepa Khare – AR Revenue by Shri S P Walimbe – DR Date of hearing 27/06/2022 Date of pronouncement 28/06/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order

RAJDEEP BUILDCON PVT LTD, AHMEDNAGAR,AHMEDNAGAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 469/PUN/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. 9. As regards to the issue of raising fresh claim of deduction in the return filed us 153A of the Act, the appellant has relied on the decision of Hon'ble ITAT Mumbal in the case of DCIT Vs. Eversmile Construction Co. Pvt Ltd (ITA No.4238/MUM/2010) dated 30/8/2011, wherein it was held that there