BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai242Delhi159Bangalore140Kolkata89Chennai75Ahmedabad68Pune61Hyderabad52Chandigarh47Cochin47Visakhapatnam39Cuttack35Jaipur34Rajkot23Raipur22Surat19Jodhpur12Guwahati12Nagpur12Amritsar10Panaji5Ranchi4Allahabad4Indore4Karnataka3Lucknow3SC2Jabalpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 40109Section 194A44Addition to Income44TDS42Disallowance35Deduction35Section 80P34Section 80P(2)(d)31Section 80P(2)(a)30Section 143(3)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. MANORAMA COOP BANK LTD, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2157/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2157/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Acit, Cricle-2, Solapur. Vs. Manorama Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Plot 4, 5, 6 Vijapur Road, Indiranagar S.O., Maharashtra- 413004. Pan : Aajfm6823C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Ms. Shilpa N. C. Assessee By : Shri Pramod S. Shingte Date Of Hearing : 22.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 15.07.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1) The Ld Cit(A), Nfac Has Erred In Admitting This Exemption U/S 194A (3)(V) To The Assessee For Non-Deduction Of Tds On Interest Credits Of Nominal Members Who Are Not Actual Member As Per Definition Of Person Who Is Eligible For Membership As Per Clause

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Ms. Shilpa N. C
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194A

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

29
Section 14826
Section 26316
Section 194A(3)(v)
Section 40

section 194A(3) requiring no deduction of tax at source. Since the assessee made payment of interest amounting to Rs.4,20,773/- to HUF and unregistered firms, which happened to be its “Members”, we hold that the authorities below were not justified in making and confirming disallowance

M/S. NASHIK DISTRICT INDUSTRAIL & MERCANTILE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1967/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1967/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Nashik District Industrial & Mercantile Co-Op. Bank Ltd., 1, Shivkamal Appt., Canada Corner, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Nashik – 422005 …. Pan: Aaaan1531A Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 1(2), Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Sanket JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 40

section 194A(3)(v) applicable for A.Y.2012 -13, co-operative banks were not liable to deduct TDS u/s 194A in respect of interest paid to its members and hence, there was no reason to make any disallowance

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,PUNE vs. ACIT., CIR-2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 24/PUN/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 519/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 521/PUN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1 , SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 517/PUN/2020[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1770/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 518/PUN/2020[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 520/PUN/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

MANDHESHWARI URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO-OP BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -1,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1153/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 516/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD - 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 25/PUN/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

disallowing the interest paid on deposits received from such non- 5. Being aggrieved by the order of assessment, an appeal was filed before the ld. CIT(A) who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., (FORMERLY: BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LTD.,),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of Revenue and Cross Objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 356/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.356/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Kirit Kamdar
Section 201Section 271C

194A on the interest amount so paid, if the said payment is liable for tax deduction at source, it was noticed that provisions of sec. 40(a)(ia) do not provide for absolute disallowance as in the case of say, sec. 40A(3) of the Act. The amount disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) in one year can be claimed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12 PUNE, PUNE vs. JANATA GRAHAK MADHYAWARTI SAHKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1745/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act, to the total income of Rs.1,54,81,910/- returned by the assessee u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act vide his order dated 26.05.2023. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in para 5.4 of his appellate order observed that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12 PUNE, PUNE vs. JANATA GRAHAK MADHYAWARTI SAHKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1746/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act, to the total income of Rs.1,54,81,910/- returned by the assessee u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act vide his order dated 26.05.2023. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in para 5.4 of his appellate order observed that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 12 PUNE, PUNE vs. JANATA GRAHAK MADHYAWARTI SAHKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1747/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act, to the total income of Rs.1,54,81,910/- returned by the assessee u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act vide his order dated 26.05.2023. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in para 5.4 of his appellate order observed that

ANJALI PUSHKAR HINGANE,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3),, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2837/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.2837/Pun/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year : 2012-13 Anjali Pushkar Hingane, Prop. M/S Areen Petroleum Services, Saikheda Phata, At Post Chandori, Taluka- Niphad, Dist. Nashik. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan : Abiph8603F …. Vs. Ito, Ward- 1(3), …. ""यथ"/ Respondent Nashik.

For Appellant: Shri Sanket JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Gawli
Section 194A

disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Rs.5,80,108/- made by the A.O. in respect of interest payment made to M/s. The Sanjivani Gramin Biger Sheti Patsanstha without appreciating that the assessee was not required to deduct TDS in respect of the said payment as per the provisions of section 194A(3

M/S KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 704/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkende
Section 143(2)Section 40Section 43C

disallowing entire expenditure is not justified. 3. The first issue raised in the grounds of appeal No.1 and 2 relates to the order of the CIT(A) / NFAC in confirming the addition of Rs.14,70,250/- out of the addition of Rs.25,02,250/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 43CA of the Act. 4. Facts of the case

TOKAI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,HINGOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-(1), JALNA, JALNA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 571/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri G.D.Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.571/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Tokai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Vs Ward-1, Jalna. Villag Kurunda, Taluka Basmath . District, Hingoli – 431512. Pan: Aaat6997Q Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Anand Partani – Ar Revenue By Shri M.G.Jasnani – Dr Date Of Hearing 16/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/01/2024

Section 194ASection 250Section 270ASection 37(1)Section 40aSection 43B

disallowance(s) regarding interest claims involving varying sums paid to M/s.Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank, its Members and the Parbhani District Central Co-operative Bank; respectively. That being the case, we are of the considered opinion that such interest payments do not attract TDS deduction under section 194A(3

KUDALE AGRO FOODS,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-14, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1619/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 197Section 201(1)Section 40

3,92,050/- (being 30% of total interest paid Rs.13,06,800/-) u/s 40(a)(ia) on account of non-deduction of tax on interest paid to NBFCs. It is your appellant's contention that appellant's case is covered under proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and appellant prays for appropriate relief.” 5. The Ld. AR reiterated the same