BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “disallowance”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi560Mumbai194Bangalore115Chennai76Amritsar74Chandigarh66Cochin60Jaipur44Allahabad37Agra25Raipur20Hyderabad19Nagpur17Lucknow16Pune15Cuttack10Ahmedabad9Indore9Kolkata6Patna5Dehradun5Surat5Jodhpur4Karnataka4Visakhapatnam3Rajkot1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 263105Section 143(3)31Section 153D13Section 153A12Section 13211Search & Seizure10Section 153C8Revision u/s 2636Addition to Income5Section 148

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 599/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

3
Section 142(1)2
Depreciation2

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 597/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX ,,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 598/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 641/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 637/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI ENETERPRISES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 642/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI NANDGUDE PATIL ASSOCIATES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 643/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 638/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 639/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 640/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

section 153D of the Act, arose before the Tribunal in bunch of appeals in the case of Dhariwal Industries Limited Vs. CIT (supra). The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2016 observed as under:- “12. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the AO and the Ld.CIT and the paper book filed on behalf

RAMAMOORTHY VASUDEVAN,,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 967/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.967 & 968/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10 Shri Ramamoorthy Vasudevan Plot No.81, Lane No.4, North Main Road, Koregaon Park, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411001 …. Pan: Aanpr6769E Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Dharmesh Shah and Kulin MehtaFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 1Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 153DSection 263

disallow the claim of depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise

RAMAMOORTHY VASUDEVAN,,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 968/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.967 & 968/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10 Shri Ramamoorthy Vasudevan Plot No.81, Lane No.4, North Main Road, Koregaon Park, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411001 …. Pan: Aanpr6769E Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Dharmesh Shah and Kulin MehtaFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 1Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153ASection 153DSection 263

disallow the claim of depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1812/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas Bora and Riya OswalFor Respondent: Shri S. Sadananda Singh, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 37Section 68

disallowed the same u/s 37 of the Act. Thus, the Assessing Officer computed the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,22,86,304/-. 6. Before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC the assessee submitted that the reasons for reopening were communited to the assessee after 11 months of issue of notice u/s 148 of the Act although the assessee

HETAL RAKESH MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-1(2), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1727/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19 Hetal Rakesh Mehta Acit, Central Circle 1(2), 9/10, Vidya Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Vs. Pune Ghatkopar East, Mumbai – 400077 Pan: Ammpm9670L (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Ms Simran Dhawan (virtual)For Respondent: Shri Ravi Prakash
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

disallowed by holding the same as bogus purchases. The A.O. has also held that the amount paid by BVG India Ltd. to the appellant as sale consideration was received back in the form of cash which was utilized by M/s. BVG India Ltd. elsewhere. It may also be mentioned that the appeal filed by M/s. BVG India Ltd. has been