M/S KAKADE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,PUNE vs. ACIT, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SANJAY D. KAKADE,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SANJAY D. KAKADE,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SANJAY D. KAKADE,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SANJAY D. KAKADE,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SANJAY D. KAKADE,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

M/S KAKADE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,PUNE vs. ACIT, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

M/S KAKADE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,PUNE vs. ACIT, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Sri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Sri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.12 To 17/Pun/2013 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2008-09 वष"

income shall be determined; in respect of Assessment Years for which original assessments have already been completed on the date of search, by restricting additions only to those items which flow from incriminating material found during the course of the search. In the case of Mridul Commodities Pvt. Ltd. 78 taxmann.com 337 (Kolkata) it has been held that where pursuant

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

Income : Rs. 55,84,697/-” From the above additions, apart from other additions, the Assessing Officer disallowed agricultural income to the tune

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

Income : Rs. 55,84,697/-” From the above additions, apart from other additions, the Assessing Officer disallowed agricultural income to the tune

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

Income : Rs. 55,84,697/-” From the above additions, apart from other additions, the Assessing Officer disallowed agricultural income to the tune

DY. COMM. OF INCOME-TAX, CIRLCE-1,, NASHIK vs. M/S. SIDHIVINAYAK ASSOCIATES,, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and cross objections raised by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 1350/Pun/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09

disallowance of various claims made by the assessee in the revised CO. No. 100/PUN/2011 A.Y.2008-09 return of income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) accepted additional

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR vs. VIJAYKUMAR RAJARAM SHAH,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

disallowed a sum of Rs.2,87,333/- and added back the same to the total income of the assessee. Before the CIT(A) : The summary of these additions