BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai80Delhi63Chennai15Ahmedabad13Indore10Kolkata10Ranchi6Bangalore6Pune4Chandigarh4Telangana3SC3Karnataka2Jaipur1Cochin1Punjab & Haryana1Rajkot1Calcutta1Amritsar1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 80I16Business Income3Disallowance3Short Term Capital Gains2Depreciation2Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. K.J. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 605/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: N O N EFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal
Section 80ISection 80l

depreciation and loss in computing the quantum of deduction available u/s. 80I. The Hon‟ble Court has held further that the year of commencement alone need not be the „initial year‟, but depending upon the facts of the case and the option exercised by the assessee, the year of claim also can be considered as “initial assessment year”. The court

M/S ADVIK HI-TECH PVT LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1578/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1578/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Advik Hi-Tech Pvt. Ltd. Gat No.357/99, Chakan Talegaon Road, Vill- Kharabwadi, Tal. Khed, Chakan, Pune-410 501 Pan : Aacca3106E .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Pune.

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe

depreciation. A.Y.2011-12 2.1 The learned AO erred (learned CIT(A) in confirming) failed to appreciate the fact that the repair of existing toilet block was done merely to preserve and maintain an existing asset. 3. The appellant craves its right to add to or alter the Grounds of appeal at any time before or during the course of hearing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE vs. M/S. ADVIK HI-TECH PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1790/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1578/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Advik Hi-Tech Pvt. Ltd. Gat No.357/99, Chakan Talegaon Road, Vill- Kharabwadi, Tal. Khed, Chakan, Pune-410 501 Pan : Aacca3106E .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Pune.

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe

depreciation. A.Y.2011-12 2.1 The learned AO erred (learned CIT(A) in confirming) failed to appreciate the fact that the repair of existing toilet block was done merely to preserve and maintain an existing asset. 3. The appellant craves its right to add to or alter the Grounds of appeal at any time before or during the course of hearing

M/S. PADMAWATI WING ENERGY PVT. LTD.,,SATARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 343/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Prayag JhaFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 80I

80I and 80IA, the term initial A.Y was defined and meant the first A.Y. relevant to the previous year in which the eligible unit commences production/power generation. Only from 1.4.2000, when Sections 80IA was replaced with Section 80IA and 80IB, the definition of “initial A.Y.” did not find a mention. But nowhere, in the Parliament Speech of memorandum explaining