Search: depreciation

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41 Mumbai31 Bangalore17 Chennai10 Kolkata5 Pune5 Hyderabad5 SC4 Ahmedabad3 Guwahati2 Cochin2 Panaji2 Visakhapatnam1 Chandigarh1 Karnataka1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 14A8 Section 143(3)5 Addition to Income5 Section 1324 Section 153A4 Section 354 Deduction4 Depreciation4 Disallowance4 Search & Seizure

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2149/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Jan 2021AY 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh PatelFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 31

35A to 35E. 24. Section 37(1) states that any expenditure laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business or profession shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession". But, Section 37 (1) excludes three items of expenditure. They are (i) expenditure of the nature described

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

JAYA HIND INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9,, PUNE

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA LTD.,, PUNE