BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

131 results for “depreciation”+ Section 32(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,535Delhi2,260Bangalore962Chennai780Kolkata497Ahmedabad362Hyderabad225Jaipur218Raipur152Chandigarh138Pune131Karnataka129Indore90Amritsar77Surat70Cuttack58Visakhapatnam54SC54Rajkot49Lucknow48Cochin32Telangana29Guwahati27Jodhpur26Nagpur25Kerala18Ranchi15Calcutta14Dehradun12Allahabad11Panaji11Agra10Patna5Orissa4Rajasthan2Jabalpur1S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Varanasi1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)68Addition to Income63Section 3557Disallowance45Deduction40Depreciation39Section 143(1)38Section 80J38Section 115B34Section 143(2)

ASHOK NARAYAN BHOSALE,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 1501/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1501/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Ashok Narayan Bhosale, The Deputy Commissioner Of Ashok Narayan Bhosle Bunglow At Vs Income Tax, Kaveri Nagar, Pratham Housing Cirlce-8, Pune. Society, Wakad, Pune – 411057. Pan: Aaspb 3588 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri S.P.Walimbe - Dr Date Of Hearing 10/03/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14/03/2022

Section 1Section 10Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 32

ii) of sub-section 1 of Section 32 of the Act and observed as under:— “10.1:- The plain language of section 32(1)(iia) read along with relevant proviso would have us come to the conclusion that, there is no limitation in the assessee claiming the balance 10 per cent of additional depreciation

Showing 1–20 of 131 · Page 1 of 7

31
Section 14A26
Section 12A25

REXEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 981/PUN/2024[AY 2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 May 2025
Section 32(1)Section 43(1)Section 43(6)

Section 32 of\nthe Act, which reads as follows:\n\"Depreciation.\n32. (1) In respect of depreciation of-\n(i) buildings, machinery, plant or furniture, being tangible assets;\n(ii

M/S GERA DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1053/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Hari KrishanFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

depreciation, (by 13 M/s Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. applying 5th proviso to clause (ii) of sub section (1) of section 32

ZF STEERING GEAR (INDIA) LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1 (1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 309/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 143(3)Section 14A

ii) of sub-section 1 of Section 32 of the Act and observed as under:- “10.1 : The plain language of sec. 32(1)(iia) read along with relevant proviso would have us to come to the conclusion that, there is no limitation in the assessee claiming the balance 10 per cent of additional depreciation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE -5, PUNE vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA PVT LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 323/PUN/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri J. P. Chadraker
Section 10ASection 14ASection 35Section 35(1)

32. The ld. CIT-DR submits that the CIT(A) grossly erred in allowing the benefit of deduction u/s 10AA even in respect of deemed exports made to UNICEF against the plain provisions of section 10AA of the Act. 33. The ld. Sr. Counsel submits that the provisions of section 10AA were introduced in the Income

SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos. 154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA

ITA 156/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.154 To 156/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

section 2(24(xviii) of the Act. 31. Aggrieved Revenue is now in appeal before this Tribunal 32. Ld. DR firstly contended that incorrect claim was made by the assessee in the return by the assessee showing it as exempt income and on the other hand has reduced it from the actual cost of the fixed assets

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-5, PUNE vs. SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD., PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos. 154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA

ITA 114/PUN/2025[2020]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.154 To 156/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

section 2(24(xviii) of the Act. 31. Aggrieved Revenue is now in appeal before this Tribunal 32. Ld. DR firstly contended that incorrect claim was made by the assessee in the return by the assessee showing it as exempt income and on the other hand has reduced it from the actual cost of the fixed assets

ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PUNE, PUNE vs. SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PRIVATE LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos. 154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA

ITA 1844/PUN/2024[2019]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.154 To 156/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

section 2(24(xviii) of the Act. 31. Aggrieved Revenue is now in appeal before this Tribunal 32. Ld. DR firstly contended that incorrect claim was made by the assessee in the return by the assessee showing it as exempt income and on the other hand has reduced it from the actual cost of the fixed assets

SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD.,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos. 154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA

ITA 1423/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.154 To 156/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

section 2(24(xviii) of the Act. 31. Aggrieved Revenue is now in appeal before this Tribunal 32. Ld. DR firstly contended that incorrect claim was made by the assessee in the return by the assessee showing it as exempt income and on the other hand has reduced it from the actual cost of the fixed assets

SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos. 154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA

ITA 154/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.154 To 156/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2016-17 To 2018-19

For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

section 2(24(xviii) of the Act. 31. Aggrieved Revenue is now in appeal before this Tribunal 32. Ld. DR firstly contended that incorrect claim was made by the assessee in the return by the assessee showing it as exempt income and on the other hand has reduced it from the actual cost of the fixed assets

SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. ITO WARD6(1), PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos.154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the\nassessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA\nNo

ITA 157/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

depreciation etc.\"\n\nNo question of law, therefore, arises in this respect.\n\n12.\nQuestion No.3 itself records that the issue at hand is\ncovered by the decision of this Court in case of HDFC_v/s.\nDCIT reported in 366 ITR 505 but that, the department has not\naccepted the decision of the High Court. In that view, this\nquestion

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (OSD), CIRCLE-5,, PUNE vs. ROHAN AND RAJDEEP INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 54/PUN/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jan 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A.M. Krishnan
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and such right is a depreciable and assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (OSD), CIRCLE-5,, PUNE vs. ROHAN AND RAJDEEP INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 55/PUN/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jan 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A.M. Krishnan
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and such right is a depreciable and assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (OSD), CIRCLE-5,, PUNE vs. ROHAN AND RAJDEEP INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 53/PUN/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jan 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A.M. Krishnan
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and such right is a depreciable and assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

ACIT, PUNE vs. SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PRIVATE LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos.154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the\nassessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA\nNo

ITA 1843/PUN/2024[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025
Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

depreciation etc.\"\nNo question of law, therefore, arises in this respect.\n12.\nQuestion No.3 itself records that the issue at hand is\ncovered by the decision of this Court in case of HDFC_v/s.\nDCIT reported in 366 ITR 505 but that, the department has not\naccepted the decision of the High Court. In that view, this\nquestion also

SHRINIWAS ENGINEERING AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 6(1), PUNE

In the result, ITA Nos.154 to 156/PUN/2025 filed by the\nassessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes, ITA\nNo

ITA 155/PUN/2025[2017-198]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2017-198
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 43

depreciation etc.\"\nNo question of law, therefore, arises in this respect.\n12.\nQuestion No.3 itself records that the issue at hand is\ncovered by the decision of this Court in case of HDFC_v/s.\nDCIT reported in 366 ITR 505 but that, the department has not\naccepted the decision of the High Court. In that view, this\nquestion also

AIR CONTRAL INDIA PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), PUNE

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 1538/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri B. B. ManeFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)

ii) Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited Vs Inspecting Asst. Commissioner [32 ITD 325, ITAT Bombay] Dated 03/03/1989 iii) International Computers Indian Manufactures Limited Vs Dy. CIT 63 ITD 195 (ITAT Mumbai) 18/02/1997 iv) Madhu Industries Ltd. VS ITO, ITA No.4172(AHD) of 2007 dated 23/07/2010. 3. We have claimed depreciation u/s 32(1

SUPERFINE METALS P LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), , PUNE

ITA 634/PUN/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos. 631 To 634/Pun/2021 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2010-2011 To 2013-14 Superfine Metals Private Ltd., E29/E39, Supa Midc, Tal. Parner, Ahmednagar – 414302 . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan:Aakcs6038H बनाम / V/S. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Central Circle 1(2), Pune द्वारा/ Appearances Assessee By : Shri M. K. Kulkarni Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 07/10/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; Present Bunch Of Five Appeals Of The Assessee Is Assailed Against Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-11 [For Short “Cit(A)”] All Dt. 16/11/2021 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Arose Out Of Rectification Orders Dt. 20/02/2021 Passed U/S 154 By The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(2), Pune [For Short “Ao”] For Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2010-11 To 2013-14. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri M. K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 250Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)

ii-a). The claim of additional depreciation be allowed to the appellant as per law. 8. The appellant craves to leave, add/amend or alter any of the above grounds of appeal. 5. Tersely stated the facts of the case are; 5.1 The assessee is a private limited company, filed its income tax returns [for short “ITR”] which were summarily processed

SUPERFINE METALS P LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), , PUNE

ITA 631/PUN/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos. 631 To 634/Pun/2021 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2010-2011 To 2013-14 Superfine Metals Private Ltd., E29/E39, Supa Midc, Tal. Parner, Ahmednagar – 414302 . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan:Aakcs6038H बनाम / V/S. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Central Circle 1(2), Pune द्वारा/ Appearances Assessee By : Shri M. K. Kulkarni Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 07/10/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; Present Bunch Of Five Appeals Of The Assessee Is Assailed Against Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-11 [For Short “Cit(A)”] All Dt. 16/11/2021 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Arose Out Of Rectification Orders Dt. 20/02/2021 Passed U/S 154 By The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(2), Pune [For Short “Ao”] For Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2010-11 To 2013-14. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri M. K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 250Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)

ii-a). The claim of additional depreciation be allowed to the appellant as per law. 8. The appellant craves to leave, add/amend or alter any of the above grounds of appeal. 5. Tersely stated the facts of the case are; 5.1 The assessee is a private limited company, filed its income tax returns [for short “ITR”] which were summarily processed

SUPERFINE METALS P LTD,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), , PUNE

ITA 632/PUN/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos. 631 To 634/Pun/2021 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2010-2011 To 2013-14 Superfine Metals Private Ltd., E29/E39, Supa Midc, Tal. Parner, Ahmednagar – 414302 . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan:Aakcs6038H बनाम / V/S. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, . . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Central Circle 1(2), Pune द्वारा/ Appearances Assessee By : Shri M. K. Kulkarni Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 07/10/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; Present Bunch Of Five Appeals Of The Assessee Is Assailed Against Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-11 [For Short “Cit(A)”] All Dt. 16/11/2021 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Arose Out Of Rectification Orders Dt. 20/02/2021 Passed U/S 154 By The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(2), Pune [For Short “Ao”] For Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2010-11 To 2013-14. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri M. K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 250Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)

ii-a). The claim of additional depreciation be allowed to the appellant as per law. 8. The appellant craves to leave, add/amend or alter any of the above grounds of appeal. 5. Tersely stated the facts of the case are; 5.1 The assessee is a private limited company, filed its income tax returns [for short “ITR”] which were summarily processed