Search: depreciation

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai16 Ahmedabad10 Delhi6 Jaipur4 Raipur2 Pune2 Agra1 Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 271D12 Section 269S6 Section 1323 Section 1482 Section 1472 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1375/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh B. Budruk, Addl.CIT

Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

271D of the Act. 8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the assessee supported the order of the Ld.CIT(A) and referred to the following written submissions:- “1. BACKGROUND 1.1 The Assessee is a company formed under the Companion Act, 1956, and is in the business of construction and property development since over 35 years. The Assessee Company

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

M/S KARIA BUILDERS ,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 14(3), PUNE

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD., AURANGABAD. vs. TAPADIYA CONSTRUCTION LTD, AURANGABAD

M/S KARIA BUILDERS ,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 14(3), PUNE