BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai15Chennai15Ahmedabad7Delhi7Jaipur7Pune5Visakhapatnam3Bangalore3Raipur3Kolkata2Patna2Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271B25Section 44A10Section 1325Section 1445Section 139(1)5Capital Gains5Business Income5Unexplained Investment5Cash Deposit5Penalty

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1300/PUN/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

271B of the Act against the assessee for his failure to gets its accounts audited. The ld. AR contends that there were no sales or purchase made by the assessee during the year under consideration and the additions made on account of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained investments, unexplained other investments and unexplained profit on sale of land to an extent

5
Addition to Income5
Search & Seizure5

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1304/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

271B of the Act against the assessee for his failure to gets its accounts audited. The ld. AR contends that there were no sales or purchase made by the assessee during the year under consideration and the additions made on account of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained investments, unexplained other investments and unexplained profit on sale of land to an extent

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1302/PUN/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

271B of the Act against the assessee for his failure to gets its accounts audited. The ld. AR contends that there were no sales or purchase made by the assessee during the year under consideration and the additions made on account of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained investments, unexplained other investments and unexplained profit on sale of land to an extent

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1303/PUN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

271B of the Act against the assessee for his failure to gets its accounts audited. The ld. AR contends that there were no sales or purchase made by the assessee during the year under consideration and the additions made on account of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained investments, unexplained other investments and unexplained profit on sale of land to an extent

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1301/PUN/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

271B of the Act against the assessee for his failure to gets its accounts audited. The ld. AR contends that there were no sales or purchase made by the assessee during the year under consideration and the additions made on account of unexplained cash deposits, unexplained investments, unexplained other investments and unexplained profit on sale of land to an extent