BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi390Karnataka127Mumbai81Bangalore47Kolkata43Calcutta35Amritsar33Chennai33Telangana31Kerala18Ahmedabad16SC16Jaipur10Punjab & Haryana9Chandigarh6Pune6Lucknow5Cuttack5Hyderabad5Indore5Orissa4Nagpur2Cochin2Jabalpur2Gauhati2Raipur1Rajasthan1Visakhapatnam1Surat1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 153C24Section 260A6Section 43D5Section 143(3)4Section 32(1)(ii)4Depreciation4Section 1453

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 61/PUN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 62/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 60/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 63/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. M/S. PUNE CANTONMENT SAHAKARI BANK LTD,, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of Revenue are dismissed

ITA 435/PUN/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj DandgavelFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Haldar
Section 145Section 148Section 154Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43D

depreciation had been claimed on the earlier years had not been identified, the issue was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for consideration afresh and partly allowed the Appeal. Being aggrieved by the said order, Karnataka Bank Ltd. preferred an Appeal to the Karnataka High Court under section 260A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHARAD NAGARI SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,, SOLAPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1240/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Achal SharmaFor Respondent: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 145Section 260ASection 43D

260A on the similar issue have also been filed by the Hon'ble Pr.CIT-6 Pune in the case of Shankarrao Mohite Patil Sahakari Bank Ltd., Akluj Dist.:-Solapur for A.Y 2009-10 and A.Y 2010-11 wherein similar issue of accrued interest on NPA has been involved. 8. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case