BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

31 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai262Delhi177Bangalore153Jaipur51Chennai40Cochin37Hyderabad36Pune31Ahmedabad28Visakhapatnam22Kolkata19Guwahati16Karnataka15Chandigarh9Cuttack6Lucknow5Dehradun5Kerala5Raipur3Nagpur2Indore2Rajkot2Calcutta1Rajasthan1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 263105Section 143(3)36Section 153C32Section 13227Section 271(1)(c)21Section 153A16Addition to Income16Search & Seizure15Section 14814Section 147

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1812/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas Bora and Riya OswalFor Respondent: Shri S. Sadananda Singh, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 37Section 68

depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment year and for which a prior notice under Section 148 would be required to be issued. Section 147 does not contemplate an eventuality which Section 153A or Section 153C contemplates, the basis of which is inter alia a search action under Section 132 being resorted as noted hereinabove. Thus

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

13
Depreciation11
Revision u/s 2636

DCIT CIRCLE 1 NASHIK, NASHIK vs. SHREE SAI PROPERTIES, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 987/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Subodh Ratnaparkhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde, CIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment year and for which a prior notice under Section 148 would be required to be issued. Section 147 does not contemplate an eventuality which Section 153A or Section 153C contemplates, the basis of which is inter alia a search action under Section 132 being resorted as noted hereinabove. Thus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 62/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 61/PUN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 63/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 60/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

depreciation on ‘Licence to collect toll’ considering it as an intangible asset in terms of section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the department has not accepted the decision of the ITAT, Pune and an appeal has been filed

KAY POWER AND PAPER LIMITED,SATARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1436/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 148Section 148A

depreciation is of Rs.31,61,21,110/-. It was submitted that the net profit earned on derivative transactions referred to in the notice u/s 148 of the Act has been properly accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account and there is no attempt to avoid income tax. It was accordingly requested to drop the proceedings initiated

KAY POWER AND PAPER LIMITED,SATARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1437/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 148Section 148A

depreciation is of Rs.31,61,21,110/-. It was submitted that the net profit earned on derivative transactions referred to in the notice u/s 148 of the Act has been properly accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account and there is no attempt to avoid income tax. It was accordingly requested to drop the proceedings initiated

UMESH DHONDIRAM SHINDE,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1365/PUN/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1363 To 1367/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 132Section 153A

153C the authority before ordering the extreme step of search action u/s 132 was required to be satisfied about the existence of reasons for eventuality catalogued in Cl. (c) of sub-section (1) of S. 132 since under the CL (c) it is mandatorily required to be specified that any person is in possession of any money, bullion, jewellery

UMESH DHONDIRAM SHINDE,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1366/PUN/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1363 To 1367/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 132Section 153A

153C the authority before ordering the extreme step of search action u/s 132 was required to be satisfied about the existence of reasons for eventuality catalogued in Cl. (c) of sub-section (1) of S. 132 since under the CL (c) it is mandatorily required to be specified that any person is in possession of any money, bullion, jewellery

UMESH DHONDIRAM SHINDE,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1364/PUN/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1363 To 1367/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 132Section 153A

153C the authority before ordering the extreme step of search action u/s 132 was required to be satisfied about the existence of reasons for eventuality catalogued in Cl. (c) of sub-section (1) of S. 132 since under the CL (c) it is mandatorily required to be specified that any person is in possession of any money, bullion, jewellery

UMESH DHONDIRAM SHINDE,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1367/PUN/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1363 To 1367/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 132Section 153A

153C the authority before ordering the extreme step of search action u/s 132 was required to be satisfied about the existence of reasons for eventuality catalogued in Cl. (c) of sub-section (1) of S. 132 since under the CL (c) it is mandatorily required to be specified that any person is in possession of any money, bullion, jewellery

UMESH DHONDIRAM SHINDE,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1363/PUN/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Mar 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1363 To 1367/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2004-05 To 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi, JCIT
Section 132Section 153A

153C the authority before ordering the extreme step of search action u/s 132 was required to be satisfied about the existence of reasons for eventuality catalogued in Cl. (c) of sub-section (1) of S. 132 since under the CL (c) it is mandatorily required to be specified that any person is in possession of any money, bullion, jewellery

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 597/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

1. The learned CIT erred in passing order u/s 263 of the I.T. Act and setting aside the assessment order dt. 28.03.2013, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C. Therefore, it is prayed to cancel the revision order passed u/s 263. 2. The learned CIT erred in holding that, no proper enquiries were carried out with respect to the seized/impounded material

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX ,,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 598/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

1. The learned CIT erred in passing order u/s 263 of the I.T. Act and setting aside the assessment order dt. 28.03.2013, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C. Therefore, it is prayed to cancel the revision order passed u/s 263. 2. The learned CIT erred in holding that, no proper enquiries were carried out with respect to the seized/impounded material

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 599/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

1. The learned CIT erred in passing order u/s 263 of the I.T. Act and setting aside the assessment order dt. 28.03.2013, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C. Therefore, it is prayed to cancel the revision order passed u/s 263. 2. The learned CIT erred in holding that, no proper enquiries were carried out with respect to the seized/impounded material

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

1. The learned CIT erred in passing order u/s 263 of the I.T. Act and setting aside the assessment order dt. 28.03.2013, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C. Therefore, it is prayed to cancel the revision order passed u/s 263. 2. The learned CIT erred in holding that, no proper enquiries were carried out with respect to the seized/impounded material

MANAV PACKAGING INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 2420/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Aug 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 43B

depreciation on Plant & Machinery and under Sec.43B of the Act etc. under sec.143 rws 147 of the Act. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of the income by treating above disallowances as suppression of income by claiming set off of losses/expenses in respect of discontinued businesses. In response

MANAV PACKAGING INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 2419/PUN/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Aug 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 43B

depreciation on Plant & Machinery and under Sec.43B of the Act etc. under sec.143 rws 147 of the Act. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of the income by treating above disallowances as suppression of income by claiming set off of losses/expenses in respect of discontinued businesses. In response

MANAV PACKAGING INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 2418/PUN/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Aug 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 43B

depreciation on Plant & Machinery and under Sec.43B of the Act etc. under sec.143 rws 147 of the Act. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of the income by treating above disallowances as suppression of income by claiming set off of losses/expenses in respect of discontinued businesses. In response