BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

31 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai262Delhi177Bangalore153Jaipur50Chennai40Cochin37Hyderabad36Pune31Ahmedabad28Visakhapatnam21Kolkata19Guwahati16Karnataka15Chandigarh9Cuttack6Lucknow5Dehradun5Kerala5Raipur3Nagpur2Calcutta2Indore2Rajkot2Rajasthan1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 263105Section 143(3)36Section 153C32Section 13227Section 271(1)(c)21Section 153A16Addition to Income16Search & Seizure15Section 14814Section 147

DCIT CIRCLE 1 NASHIK, NASHIK vs. SHREE SAI PROPERTIES, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 987/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Subodh Ratnaparkhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde, CIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment year and for which a prior notice under Section 148 would be required to be issued. Section 147 does not contemplate an eventuality which Section 153A or Section 153C

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

13
Depreciation11
Revision u/s 2636

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1812/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas Bora and Riya OswalFor Respondent: Shri S. Sadananda Singh, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 37Section 68

depreciation allowance or any other allowance or deduction for such assessment year and for which a prior notice under Section 148 would be required to be issued. Section 147 does not contemplate an eventuality which Section 153A or Section 153C

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 61/PUN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

Section 153C r.w.s 143(3). 2. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or modify any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 5. The issue raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in allowing the depreciation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 62/PUN/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

Section 153C r.w.s 143(3). 2. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or modify any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 5. The issue raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in allowing the depreciation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 63/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

Section 153C r.w.s 143(3). 2. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or modify any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 5. The issue raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in allowing the depreciation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. ASHOKA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD.,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross-

ITA 60/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Mar 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 260ASection 32(1)(ii)

Section 153C r.w.s 143(3). 2. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or modify any ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 5. The issue raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in allowing the depreciation

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

153C of the Act were invoked and thereafter, assessment in the case of assessee was taken up. The Assessing Officer re-worked the income in the hands of assessee. The assessment order was passed with the prior approval of JCIT, Central Range, Nashik, obtained vide his letter dated 28.03.2013. The Commissioner was of the view that the order passed

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 599/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

153C of the Act were invoked and thereafter, assessment in the case of assessee was taken up. The Assessing Officer re-worked the income in the hands of assessee. The assessment order was passed with the prior approval of JCIT, Central Range, Nashik, obtained vide his letter dated 28.03.2013. The Commissioner was of the view that the order passed

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 597/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

153C of the Act were invoked and thereafter, assessment in the case of assessee was taken up. The Assessing Officer re-worked the income in the hands of assessee. The assessment order was passed with the prior approval of JCIT, Central Range, Nashik, obtained vide his letter dated 28.03.2013. The Commissioner was of the view that the order passed

VISHWA INFRAWAYS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX ,,

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 598/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.596, 597 & 599/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nagpur आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.598/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Vishwa Infraways Pvt. Ltd., A-2/3, Pramukh Vihar, Naroli Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Silvasa – 396230 …. Pan: Aaccv7999Q Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Circle-1, Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.B. Prasad, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 153DSection 263

153C of the Act were invoked and thereafter, assessment in the case of assessee was taken up. The Assessing Officer re-worked the income in the hands of assessee. The assessment order was passed with the prior approval of JCIT, Central Range, Nashik, obtained vide his letter dated 28.03.2013. The Commissioner was of the view that the order passed

KAY POWER AND PAPER LIMITED,SATARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1436/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 148Section 148A

depreciation is of Rs.31,61,21,110/-. It was submitted that the net profit earned on derivative transactions referred to in the notice u/s 148 of the Act has been properly accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account and there is no attempt to avoid income tax. It was accordingly requested to drop the proceedings initiated

KAY POWER AND PAPER LIMITED,SATARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1437/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 148Section 148A

depreciation is of Rs.31,61,21,110/-. It was submitted that the net profit earned on derivative transactions referred to in the notice u/s 148 of the Act has been properly accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account and there is no attempt to avoid income tax. It was accordingly requested to drop the proceedings initiated

NATHARAM PANAJI CHOUDHARY,PUNE vs. I.T.O. WARD 8(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1823/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Kumar (Virtually)For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

depreciation allowance or any other allowance has been computed under the provisions of the Act. 4.3.2 Action under section 147 is permissible even if the Assessing officer gathers his reasons to believe from the very same record as has been the subject matter of the completed assessment proceedings. There might indeed be a presumption that the assessment proceedings have been

NATHARAM PANAJI CHOUDHARY,PUNE vs. I.T.O. WARD 8(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1826/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Kumar (Virtually)For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

depreciation allowance or any other allowance has been computed under the provisions of the Act. 4.3.2 Action under section 147 is permissible even if the Assessing officer gathers his reasons to believe from the very same record as has been the subject matter of the completed assessment proceedings. There might indeed be a presumption that the assessment proceedings have been

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 637/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI ENETERPRISES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 642/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI NANDGUDE PATIL ASSOCIATES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 643/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 641/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 640/PUN/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263

M/S. B.U. BHANDARI SCHEMES,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 639/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.637 To 641/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2013-14 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Schemes, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb6865J Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.642/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Enterprises, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aaifb0139M Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.643/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S. B.U. Bhandari Nandgude Patil Associates, 1182, Above Hdfc Bank, Fc Road, Shivaji Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagfb8429C Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Pune

For Appellant: Shri V.L. Jain
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 263

depreciation on assets of Hyderabad unit which is defunct for A.Y.2008-09 to 2010-11. 13. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since the order has been passed by the Assessing Officer after obtaining approval of the Addl.CIT u/s.153D of the I.T. Act, therefore, the Ld.CIT has no power to exercise his jurisdiction u/s.263