BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed
ITA 1133/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Jun 2018AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"
For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Smt. Nirupama Kotru, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 36
Depreciation allowed as per
4,37,400
4,37,400
para 9 on a/c of addition of capital expenditure
Total Income
2,76,11,529
OR Rounded to 2,76,11,530
5. In the assessment, AO rejected the claim of exemption u/s.11 and
12 of the Act. For this decision, AO examined the issues relating to the
violation