Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 92Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6 Mumbai6 Chennai4 Pune4 Bangalore4 Jaipur1 Ahmedabad1 Karnataka1 Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 9(1)(vi)6 Section 143(3)4 Section 14A4 Section 10A4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 234B4 Section 80I2 Section 402 Deduction

MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed and appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 592/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.577/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra AgiwalFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 92C

delay of one day is thus, condoned. 7. Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee had furnished return of income declaring total income of ₹ 4,04,01,599/-. The return of income was processed under section 143(1) of the Act. The assessee company was engaged in the business of software development. Since the assessee had entered into

MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. MSC SOFTWARE CORPORATION OF INDIA PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIR 1(1), PUNE vs. EATON TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIR 1(1), PUNE vs. EATON TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,, PUNE