BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

203 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)(i)clear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad203Pune203Mumbai182Chennai176Jaipur136Kolkata92Delhi64Hyderabad52Bangalore52Surat38Chandigarh25Nagpur21Lucknow17Indore15Amritsar14Rajkot14Agra7Visakhapatnam7Jabalpur6Jodhpur6Panaji5Raipur4Cuttack4Cochin3Allahabad3SC2Patna1Ranchi1Guwahati1Varanasi1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1

Key Topics

Section 12A259Section 80G(5)201Section 80G172Section 12A(1)(ac)146Exemption100Condonation of Delay36Section 80G(5)(vi)28Section 1122Section 119(2)(b)

DECCAN GYMKHANA,PUNE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 444/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Sharad A Vaze &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 30.09.2023 for approval of the trust under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub section (5) of section 80G

DECCAN GYMKHANA,DECCAN vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

Showing 1–20 of 203 · Page 1 of 11

...
20
Charitable Trust20
Section 15418
Limitation/Time-bar14

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1554/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Sharad A Vaze &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 30.09.2023 for approval of the trust under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub section (5) of section 80G

KALYAN CHARITY TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMP), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 946/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S.M. BandiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) of the Act, it is evident that the time limits prescribed therein are mandatory and the Commissioner of Income Tax has no power to condone the delay

CENTURY RAYON EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMP), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 947/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S.M. BandiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) of the Act, it is evident that the time limits prescribed therein are mandatory and the Commissioner of Income Tax has no power to condone the delay

ARUN AASHRAY ,PUNE vs. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraarun Aashray The Cit (Exemption), 1541 Clover Highlands, Near Pune Vs. Nibm, Pisoli Road, Kondhwa, Pune – 411048 Pan: Aacta2725Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nikhil Mutha Department By : Shri Prashant Gadekar Date Of Hearing : 15-04-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil MuthaFor Respondent: Shri Prashant Gadekar
Section 10Section 10(230)Section 119Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case in brief, are that the assessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 28.09.2023 for approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub section (5) of section 80G

KHANDESH MARATHA MANDAL,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1302/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Abhilash HiranFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. In view of the above, the application dated 07/10/2024 in form 10AB filed by the assessee is hereby rejected.” 4. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal and all the grounds of appeal relate thereto. 5. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed two applications with

PRAGATIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA ,AHMEDNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 458/PUN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amod Sharad VazeFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 51 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

SHRI GANESH BAHUJAN VIDYAPRASARAKSANSTHA ,AHMEDNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 456/PUN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sharad VazeFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 51 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

JANATA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,AHMEDNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 457/PUN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sharad VazeFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 51 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

ABHINAV SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,AHMEDNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 459/PUN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sharad VazeFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12ASection 800(5)Section 800(5)(v)Section 800(5)(vi)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(v)Section 80G(5)(vi)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 20 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

GRAMVIKAS SANSTHA CHIKHALI,AHMEDNAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 460/PUN/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sharad VazeFor Respondent: Shri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12ASection 800(5)Section 800(5)(v)Section 800(5)(vi)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(v)Section 80G(5)(vi)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 82 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

ACTION FOR IMPACT FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 649/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.649/Pun/2025 Action For Impact Foundation, Cit, Exemption, Flat No. 408, Gold Croft, Co-Op Hsg Pune Society, Chinchwad Station Road, Vs. Thergaon, B.O. Tanaji Nagar, Pune-411033 Pan : Aavca7643K अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Deepa Khare Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 15-05-2025 Date Of 10-07-2025 Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)Section 80G(5)(vi)

condone the delay in filing application in Form No. 10AB.” 3. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal : “1. The Ld. CIT Exemption erred in law and on facts in treating the application under Clause (1) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G

ANANDCARE CHARITABLE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 635/PUN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”). 2. The assessee has filed this appeal with a delay of 38 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation

ARTH FOUNDATION,NASHIK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2258/PUN/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2026AY 2026-27

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2258/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2026-27 Arth Foundation, V Commissioner Of Income Flat No.3, Tulip Apartment, S Tax (Exemption), Pune. Suyojit Garden, Gangapur Road, Nashik – 422013. Pan: Aahta2324C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Ca Trishala R Jain (Virtual) Revenue By Shri Amol Khairnar – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 21/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 29/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Passed Under Section 80G Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 01.08.2025. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : ―1. The Learned Cit(E), Pune Has Erred In Rejecting The 1 Application Of The Appellant Trust Filed U/S 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Act Without Considering The Merits Of The Case.

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

80G, leading to the dismissal of the application. 3. That we are filing this appeal before the Hon'ble ITAT specifically seeking condonation of the delay, as your esteemed Tribunal has the power and jurisdiction to condone such delays. 3 The Trust respectfully submits that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional but purely due to unavoidable circumstances, and therefore

SHRI VARDHAMAN STHANAKWASI JAIN SHRAWAK SANGH,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1912/PUN/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1912/Pun/2025 Shri Vardhaman Vs. Cit, Exemption, Pune. Sthanakwasi Jain Shrawak Sangh, 1 Guru Ganesh Bhavan, Paavan Tapodham, Near Shivaji Statue, Jalna- 431203. Pan : Aahts5220K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Amit Bobde Date Of Hearing : 16.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 23.05.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit, Exemption, Pune Rejecting The Application For Registration U/S 80G(5) Of The It Act. 2. There Is Delay Of 8 Days In Filing Of The Present Appeal. We Are Satisfied With The Reasons Mentioned In The Affidavit For Condonation That The Applicant Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause For Not Filing The Appeal Within The Prescribed Time Limit. After Hearing Ld. Dr

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

condone the delay of 8 days and proceed to adjudicate the appeal. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a trust filed its application for registration in Form No.10AB under clause (ii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

BABURAO CHANDERE SOCIAL FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 389/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrababurao Chandere Social Foundation Cit (Exemption), Pune 3Rd Floor, Flat No.301, 1 Wing, Sr. Vs. No.89, Uthrika Veerbhadra Nagar, Baner, Pune – 411045 Pan: Aaeab4179N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : S/Shri B C Malakar & Yuvraj Chavan Department By : Shri Sandeep Sengupta, Cit Date Of Hearing : 05-06-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12-06-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: S/Shri B C Malakar and Yuvraj ChavanFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Sengupta, CIT
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

delay of 27 days could have been condoned by him considering it a directory provision and not mandatory when all other conditions for such approval had been fulfilled by the applicant trust. The order passed rejecting/cancelling such approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act being arbitrary, illegal and bad in law be quashed and the CIT(E) be directed

SHALOM EDUCATION CENTRE,RAIGAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1293/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1293/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2024-25 Shalom Education Centre, Vs. Cit, Exemption, Pune. Priya, Laxmi Nagar, Khopoli, Raigad-410203 Maharashtra Pan-410203 Appellant Respondent

Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

5 objection was raised by him on the request of the learned AR of the assessee regarding condoning the delay of 4 days. 6. We have heard the learned counsels from both the sides and perused the material available on record. In this regard we find that as per the provisions of section 80G

SMT. MANGLA RAMNIWAS MANDHANI ABMM AWAS YOJNA FOUNDATION,JALNA vs. CIT ( EXEMPTION ), EXEMPTION

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 236/PUN/2024[N A]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 May 2024

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.236/Pun/2024 (E-Appeal)

For Appellant: Shri Anand Partani &For Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel
Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) can condone the delay occurred in filing the appeal. A mere perusal of provisions of section 80G

KAIVALYA DHAMA,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2398/PUN/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Feb 2025

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kaustubh D. Shah
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condone the delay in filing Form No.10A/10AB, as the same could not be filed in such cases within the last extended date, i.e., 30.09.2023. 3. On consideration of the matter, with a view to avoid and mitigate genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, hereby extends

EL-DORADO SOCIAL FOUNDATION,AURANGABAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1161/PUN/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1161/Pun/2025 El – Dorado Social Vs. Cit, Exemption, Pune. Foundation, Shop No.A-405, Sr. No.55, Space Olympia, Sutgirni Chowk, Aurangabad- 431001. Pan : Aagce7413A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri S. N. Puranik Revenue By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 12.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 05.03.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit, Exemption, Pune Rejecting The Application For Registration U/S 80G Of The It Act. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are, That The Assessee Filed Its Application For Approval In Form No.10Ab Under Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Sub-Section (5) Of Section 80G Of The Act On 30.09.2024. With A View To Verify The Genuineness Of Activities Of The Assessee

For Appellant: Shri S. N. PuranikFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 8Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

section 8 company incorporated on 05.11.2021. Apart from above, Ld. AR also submitted that the assessee was provisionally approved u/s 80G(5)(iv) of the Act upto 31.03.2024 and was supposed to apply for final approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act 4 prior to six months from the expiry of provisional approval i.e. on or before 30.09.2023. However