BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38Bangalore23Chennai18Mumbai16Patna7Kolkata7Delhi5Hyderabad5Pune4Visakhapatnam3Chandigarh3Amritsar2Indore2SC2Ahmedabad2Telangana1Calcutta1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 1484Addition to Income3Section 422Limitation/Time-bar2

APPASAHEB BBAURAO LONKAR,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 4(4),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 888/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Jan 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.888/Pun/2018 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Appasaheb Baburao Lonkar 562/2, Aaryavart Society, Shivajinagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411005 …. Pan: Aagpl9688R Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 4(4) Pune

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 148

delay of 417 days in filing the appeal late before the Tribunal is condoned. 3 Appasaheb Baburao Lonkar 4. The only issue raised in the present appeal is in respect of computation of long term capital gains, if any, in the hands of assessee. 5. Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee filed return of income in response

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SANGLI CIRCLE,, SANGLI vs. ANAND DEVELOPERS, SANGLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 67/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jun 2023AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel &
Section 143(3)Section 42

53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 r.w.s. 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer had also received a letter dated 23.12.2016 from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central (Circle), Kolhapur (‘the ACIT, CC, Kolhapur’) passing on C.O. No.15/PUN/2023 information of receipt of on-money consideration of Rs.8

ANAND DEVELOPERS,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), SANGLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 458/PUN/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jun 2023AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel &
Section 143(3)Section 42

53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 r.w.s. 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer had also received a letter dated 23.12.2016 from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central (Circle), Kolhapur (‘the ACIT, CC, Kolhapur’) passing on C.O. No.15/PUN/2023 information of receipt of on-money consideration of Rs.8

SANDESH VASANTRAO PAWAR,SATARA, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SATARA, MAHARASHTRA

ITA 2379/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2379/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rahul KavaleFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 250Section 45Section 53A

condone the delay of 76 days and proceed for adjudication of appeal. 4. Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal : “1. The provision of Section 2(47)(v) in reference to Section 53A