BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 481clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai43Chennai42Delhi40Kolkata27Cuttack14Bangalore12Jaipur11Hyderabad11Ahmedabad8Visakhapatnam5Chandigarh5Surat4Panaji3Cochin3Telangana3Pune3Patna2Lucknow2SC2Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Amritsar1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 15418Section 35D4Section 143(3)4Addition to Income3Section 142(1)2Section 154(1)2Deduction2Revision u/s 2632

KAILAS GENBHAU KALEKAR,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(3), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2685/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2685/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Kailas Genbhau Kalekar, V The Dcit, (Prop. Bhairavnath Milk S Central Circle-2(3), Pune. Processors), At Post – Kadus Taluka – Khed, Dist-Pune – 412404. Pan: Ccmpk1533J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Suhas P Bora & Sampada Ingale – Ar’S Revenue By Shri Amil Khairnar –Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 25/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 28.11.2024 For Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 144Section 250Section 251(2)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; dated 28.11.2024 for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA No.2685/PUN/2024 [A] “1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in dismissing appellant's appeal and confirming the action of the AO making addition of Rs. 17,04,82,609/- and Rs. 52,62,22,481

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE vs. IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1120/PUN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(1)Section 35D

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case in brief, are that the assessee is a firm engaged in the business of developing properties. It filed its return of income on 21.09.2015 declaring total income of Rs.8,46,600/-. The case of the assessee was selected through CASS

IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1792/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(1)Section 35D

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case in brief, are that the assessee is a firm engaged in the business of developing properties. It filed its return of income on 21.09.2015 declaring total income of Rs.8,46,600/-. The case of the assessee was selected through CASS