BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 451clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna150Karnataka100Mumbai47Ahmedabad37Chennai27Cochin26Kolkata22Raipur20Delhi17Jaipur14Bangalore9Hyderabad7Chandigarh6Pune4Lucknow4Indore3Nagpur3Surat2Cuttack2Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Jodhpur1Rajkot1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)10Section 143(3)4Section 564Section 271(1)(c)4Condonation of Delay4Deduction3Addition to Income3

KOLHAPUR DISTRICT CHEMIST CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,KOLHAPUR vs. DY. CIT CIRCLE 1, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1517/PUN/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Sept 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1517/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Kolhapur District Chemist Coop. Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Credit Society Limited, Kolhapur 451, E-Ward, Chemist Bhavan, Kevis Plaza, Kolhapur – 416 001 Maharashtra Pan : Aabak1663K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Mayuresh DoshiFor Respondent: Shri B.S. Rajpurohit
Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

451, E-Ward, Chemist Bhavan, Kevis Plaza, Kolhapur – 416 001 Maharashtra Pan : AABAK1663k Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Mayuresh Doshi (through Virtual) Revenue by : Shri B.S. Rajpurohit Date of hearing : 18.09.2024 Date of pronouncement : 18.09.2024 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the appellant society directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre

M/S. SHIVAJI YASHWANT KARPE,,AHMEDNAGAR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 4,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed on

ITA 3087/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. Penalty – Limbs related issue 4. Briefly stated relevant facts of the assessee include that the assessee is engaged in Medical profession and also derives income from Agriculture. During the impugned assessment year, assessee filed the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,20,000/-. As per the AIR information

CHANDRAPRABHU GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(4),, PANDHARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2427/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: Ms. Riya S. ShahFor Respondent: Mrs. Shabana Parveen
Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 8. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO noticed that assessee has earned aggregate interest of Rs.14,44,054/- on FDRs maintained with nationalized banks private sector banks, (the details of interest are listed at para 6.4 of the assessment order). AO was of the view that the interest income

CHANDRAPRABHU GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANTHA MARYADIT,,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(4),, PANDHARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2542/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am

For Appellant: Ms. Riya S. ShahFor Respondent: Mrs. Shabana Parveen
Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80P(2)(a)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 8. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO noticed that assessee has earned aggregate interest of Rs.14,44,054/- on FDRs maintained with nationalized banks private sector banks, (the details of interest are listed at para 6.4 of the assessment order). AO was of the view that the interest income