Search: condonation of delay

116 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 45(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)87 Addition to Income60 Section 234E51 Section 26349 Section 14845 Section 12A41 Section 13231 Section 200A30 Section 11

APAASSO MALI,PUNE vs. ITO 11(1), SWARGATE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1110/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Suhas KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri A D Kulkarni

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 147rSection 148Section 249Section 249(2)

5. Decision of the Appellate Authority on condonation of delay in filing the appeal:- As mentioned above, the appeal against the order under section 147r.w.s144r.w.s144Bdated 17-03-2023 served on 17-03-2023. This shows that the delay in filing the appeal as per the provisions of section 249(2) of the Act was 248 days. On perusal of Form

Showing 1–20 of 116 · Page 1 of 6

APAASSO MALI,PUNE vs. ITO 11(1), SWARGATE

APAASSO MALI,PUNE vs. ITO 11(1), SWARGATE

ARIHANT VASTUSHILP PROPCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 1(1), PUNE

ARIHANT VASTUSHILP PROPCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 1(1), PUNE

ARIHANT VASTUSHILP PROPCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 1(1), PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

MANOHAR WAMAN PANDAGALE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3), PUNE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), PUNE vs. M/S. BILCARE LIMITED, PUNE

M/S. BILCARE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), PUNE

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

KALPANA PRAKASH KALE,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 6(5), PUNE

SURESH DATTATRAY GURAV,BAVDHAN PUNE vs. ITO WARD 13(2), PUNE

MANJU MADHUSUDAN DHOOT, L/H OF LATE MADHUSUDAN DHOOT,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 1, AHMEDNAGAR

MANJU MADHUSUDAN DHOOT L/H OF LATE MADHUSUDAN DHOOT,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, AHMEDNAGAR

M/S VINCHURKAR DIAGNOSTICS P LTD,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , GHAZIABAD

M/S VINCHURKAR DIAGNOSTICS P LTD,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, , GHAZIABAD