Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 35Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai27 Mumbai15 Delhi13 Kolkata12 Hyderabad5 Ahmedabad3 Pune2 Jaipur1 Cochin1 Bangalore1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 15418 Section 35D4 Section 143(3)4 Section 142(1)2 Section 154(1)2 Deduction2 Addition to Income2 Revision u/s 2632

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE vs. IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1120/PUN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(1)Section 35D

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Facts of the case in brief, are that the assessee is a firm engaged in the business of developing properties. It filed its return of income on 21.09.2015 declaring total income of Rs.8,46,600/-. The case of the assessee was selected through CASS

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE vs. IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE vs. IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE

IMPERIAL HOUSING, PUNE,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE