Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 276Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna6 Mumbai4 Ahmedabad3 Pune3 Indore2 Hyderabad2 Delhi2 SC1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 44A6 Section 2503 Section 54B3 Business Income3 Deduction3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

In the result, all the appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1837/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sarang Gudhate, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Tripathi, Addl.CIT

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 54B

condone the delay of 1918 days in filing of each of the instant appeals before this Tribunal and admit these appeals for adjudication. 3 ITA.Nos.1837-1839/PUN./2025 (Amol Vasant Deshmukh & Ors.) 3. From perusal of the grounds of appeal, we notice that common grievance of the assessees is against the levy of penalty u/s.271

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

TULSABAI VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

AMOL VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

TULSABAI VASANT DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE

ROHINI MARUTI DESHMUKH,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), PUNE