UNIVERSAL REALTY,PUNE, INDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3), SWARGATE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.811/Pun/2025 Assessment Year : 2018-19

delay be condoned, and the Appeal should be taken up for hearing. 6) The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, modify and or delete any or all of the grounds of appeal mentioned herein above.” 7 Universal Reality 10. From the above grounds of appeal, it is manifest that the only grievance of the assessee is that ld.CIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGOAN vs. SUNIL RAMNARAYAN MANTRI, JALGAON

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

275(1)(c) expired on 29.02.2022 and hence, the penalty order u/s 271E passed on 12.03.2022 is barred by limitation.” 4. The assessee has filed the cross objection with a delay of 03 days. After hearing both the sides, we condone the said delay. 5. Briefly stated the assessee is an individual. For the AY 2016-17, he filed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 7 , PUNE , PUNE vs. TIETO INDIA P LTD, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

delay of 80 days are condoned. 3. The appellant-revenue raised three grounds of appeal amongst which the only issue emanates for our consideration is as to whether the CIT(A) justified in deleting the penalty levied by the AO u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. 4. At the outset

SANGLI DIVISION TELECOM WORKERS COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. SANGLI,SANGLI vs. ITO, WARD-1, SANGLI, SANGLI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

delay on the part of the assessee in filing of the present appeal before us, therefore, the same merits to be condoned. 4 ITA.Nos.275 &276/PUN./2024 5. On merits, it was submitted by the ld. A.R, that as the A.O while framing the assessment had after making necessary verifications taken a plausible view, therefore, the Pr. CIT had exceeded

SANGALI DIVISION TELECOM WORKERS COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SANGLI vs. ITO, WARD 1, SANGLI, SANGLI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

delay on the part of the assessee in filing of the present appeal before us, therefore, the same merits to be condoned. 4 ITA.Nos.275 &276/PUN./2024 5. On merits, it was submitted by the ld. A.R, that as the A.O while framing the assessment had after making necessary verifications taken a plausible view, therefore, the Pr. CIT had exceeded

AADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,JALGAON vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JALGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2012-13

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 4. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee M/s. Adhunik Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. (earlier known as M/s Gauri Plasticulture Pvt. Ltd.) is a company engaged in trading of drip material and onions. It filed its return of income on 31.01.2013 declaring