ANAND BHALCHANDRA KULKARNI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE-1, PUNE
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are rejected as unadmitted being non-maintainable
ITA 1356/PUN/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Feb 2024AY 2021-22
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi () Ita Nos. 1352 To 1357/Pun/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 To 2022-23 Anand Bhalchandra Kulkarni, Pr. Cit, Pune-1, G/701 Tulip Afnhb Camp Pmt Building, Swargate, Jalvvayu Vishar Phase-1, Plot-20, Vs. Pune-411037. Sec 20, Kharghar-410210. Pan No. Aanpk 7550 Q Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: Mr. Lokesh K Gandhi (ThroughFor Respondent: Mr. Mirtyunjay Barnwal (Through
Section 115VSection 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 132Section 132ASection 143Section 147Section 153ASection 153C
condoning the delay in filing revised returns on the ground of no evidences submitted by the assessee in support of claim of disability element.
Anand Bhalchandra Kulkarni way of raising grounds as reproduced above.
5. We have heard rival submission of the parties on the issue in dispute and perused the relevant material on record. At the outset, we find
