BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

194 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune194Delhi150Chennai67Bangalore37Visakhapatnam34Karnataka21Nagpur18Mumbai13Panaji10Lucknow5Kolkata3Hyderabad3Ahmedabad2Cochin2Indore2Jodhpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 234E664Section 200A510TDS96Section 15494Rectification u/s 15460Section 200A(1)53Section 206C32Condonation of Delay26Section 271H17

M/S. CHARNIYA CONSTRUCTION,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1297/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Showing 1–20 of 194 · Page 1 of 10

...
Section 25017
Section 220(2)8
Penalty5
ITA 1202/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1273/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1205/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1276/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1206/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

M/S. CHARNIYA CONSTRUCTION,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1298/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1278/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1204/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK & DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1272/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK & DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1271/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1203/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

M/S. CHARNIYA CONSTRUCTION,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC- TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1299/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1201/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1275/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1277/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,,CHALISGAON vs. DCIT TDS NASHIK AND DCIT CPC TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1274/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare -For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NAVNATH MAHADEV BHOSALE,SATARA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (CPC), TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, grounds of appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 647/PUN/2021[2013-14 926Q Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 220Section 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NAVNATH MAHADEV BHOSALE,SATARA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, grounds of appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 649/PUN/2021[2014-15 (26Q Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 220Section 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E

NAVNATH MAHADEV BHOSALE,SATARA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, grounds of appeal of the assessee are allowed

ITA 648/PUN/2021[2013-14 (26Q Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 220Section 234E

condoned the delay and adjudicate the appeal on merits. However, since the issue involved is purely legal, we decide the issue on merits as follows. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The only issue in the present appeal relates to the levy of late fees u/s 234E