MIHIR ENTERPRISES,,THANE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2),, SOLAPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2798/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Dec 2018AY 2008-09
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2798/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Mihir Enterprises, Flat No.701, Vardhaman Tower Co-Op. Bhaskar Colony, Navpada, Thane. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan: Aacfm1641H …. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. ""यथ" / Respondent Ward- 1(2), Solapur. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri P. S. Shingte ""यथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Rajesh Gawali घोषणा क" तारीख / सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 28.12.2018 Date Of Hearing : 17.12.2018 आदेश / Order Per Sushma Chowla, Jm: The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Cit(A)-7, Pune Dated 12.05.2017 Relating To Assessment Year 2008-09 Against Order Passed Under Section 144 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’). 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Learned Assessing Officer Erred In Rejecting The Appeal For Non- Attendance Without Realizing The Fact That Appellant Had Reasonable
For Appellant: Shri P. S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Gawali
Section 144
section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Learned Assessing Officer erred in rejecting the appeal for non- attendance without realizing the fact that appellant had reasonable
2
cause
