MUKUND BAJIRAO KOTE (HUF),,AHMEDNAGAR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFFICER,,
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed
ITA 81/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2008-09
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.81/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Mukund Bajirao Kote (Huf), Pimpalwadi Road, Shirdi, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Dist - Ahmednagar …. Pan: Aakhm3668L Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward – 1, Ahmednagar
For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Achal Sharma
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)Section 271(1)(b)
section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
1. The learned CIT(A)-2, Pune erred in law and on facts in not condoning the non-intentional delay
