BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

24 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune24Hyderabad11Mumbai9Kolkata9Ahmedabad9Visakhapatnam9Delhi7Cochin6Chennai4Lucknow4Rajkot4Chandigarh3Surat3Bangalore3Indore2Amritsar2Jaipur2Nagpur1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 13244Section 271E33Section 153A32Section 143(2)20Addition to Income13Section 13912Penalty12Deduction12Search & Seizure

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE SANGLI, SANGLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1327/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1324, 1326 & 1327/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15 Prakashbapu Patil Gramin V The Acit, Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat S Circle-Sangli. Sanstha Ltd., Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Savali Miraj, Sangli – 416410. Maharashtra. Pan: Aaaap1616N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Smt. Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri Rajesh Gawali – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 19/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac] For Assessment Years 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15; Dated 09.04.2024, 10.04.2024 & 09.04.2024 Respectively; Passed U/Sec.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. Since The Issue Involved Is Common, All These Three Appeals Were Heard Together

Section 139(1)Section 250Section 269TSection 271ESection 273

269T.” 4.3 From the above sentence of the Assessing Officer, it is very much clear that payment has been made to multiple depositors on various dates. However, Assessing Officer has not specified whether the individuals to whom repayment has been made is more than Rs.20,000/- or not! Assessing Officer has merely clubbed the entire deposit amount, belonging to various

Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2

12
Section 269T10
Section 271D8
Section 142(1)8

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE SANGLI, SANGLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1326/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1324, 1326 & 1327/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15 Prakashbapu Patil Gramin V The Acit, Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat S Circle-Sangli. Sanstha Ltd., Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Savali Miraj, Sangli – 416410. Maharashtra. Pan: Aaaap1616N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Smt. Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri Rajesh Gawali – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 19/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac] For Assessment Years 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15; Dated 09.04.2024, 10.04.2024 & 09.04.2024 Respectively; Passed U/Sec.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. Since The Issue Involved Is Common, All These Three Appeals Were Heard Together

Section 139(1)Section 250Section 269TSection 271ESection 273

269T.” 4.3 From the above sentence of the Assessing Officer, it is very much clear that payment has been made to multiple depositors on various dates. However, Assessing Officer has not specified whether the individuals to whom repayment has been made is more than Rs.20,000/- or not! Assessing Officer has merely clubbed the entire deposit amount, belonging to various

PRAKASHBAPU PATIL GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD,SANGLI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE SANGLI, SANGLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1324/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1324, 1326 & 1327/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15 Prakashbapu Patil Gramin V The Acit, Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat S Circle-Sangli. Sanstha Ltd., Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., Savali Miraj, Sangli – 416410. Maharashtra. Pan: Aaaap1616N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Smt. Deepa Khare – Ar Revenue By Shri Rajesh Gawali – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 19/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac] For Assessment Years 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2014-15; Dated 09.04.2024, 10.04.2024 & 09.04.2024 Respectively; Passed U/Sec.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. Since The Issue Involved Is Common, All These Three Appeals Were Heard Together

Section 139(1)Section 250Section 269TSection 271ESection 273

269T.” 4.3 From the above sentence of the Assessing Officer, it is very much clear that payment has been made to multiple depositors on various dates. However, Assessing Officer has not specified whether the individuals to whom repayment has been made is more than Rs.20,000/- or not! Assessing Officer has merely clubbed the entire deposit amount, belonging to various

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGOAN vs. SUNIL RAMNARAYAN MANTRI, JALGAON

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 269/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(3)Section 269TSection 271ESection 275(1)(c)

269T by repaying of loan other than the account payee or demand draft. Therefore, assessee was liable to pay penalty under section 271E of IT Act 1961. 2. It is submitted that monetary limit of CBDT Circulars no. 17/2019 will not apply as penalty has been levied on observation of Audit Objection, which falls under exception 10(c) as laid

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 611/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 607/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1894/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1895/PUN/2024[2018 19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA B. KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1896/PUN/2024[2018 19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 610/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

delay in filing of these appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. First we take up IT(SS)A No.39/PUN/2024 filed by the Revenue and ITA No.607/PUN/2025 filed by the assessee for assessment year 2019-20. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of carrying

PRIYANVADA AMOL MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1063/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

PRIYANVADA AMOL MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1064/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

PRIYANVADA AMOL MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1065/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1095/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1093/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1097/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1090/PUN/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1094/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

Delay condoned. Having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGUSTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 18. On careful reading of the above, we note that the Hon‟ble Supreme Court declined