BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260A(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi333Calcutta206Mumbai116Karnataka64Amritsar36Kolkata35Chennai27Telangana25Hyderabad19Ahmedabad16Chandigarh13Lucknow12Andhra Pradesh10Bangalore9SC9Cochin7Indore7Agra6Nagpur6Jaipur5Surat5Kerala4Rajasthan4Orissa2Pune2Punjab & Haryana2Himachal Pradesh2Raipur2Dehradun2Gauhati1Jabalpur1Varanasi1Jodhpur1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 144C(13)3Section 144C3Section 270A2Section 270A(8)2Section 260A2Section 144C(2)2Addition to Income2

TDK ELECTRONICS AG, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EPCOS AG),,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (IT), CIRCLE -1,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1810/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviिनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Tdk Electronics Ag Vs. Acit (It), (Formerly Known As Epcos Ag) Circle-1, Pune C/O. Epcos India Pvt. Ltd., E-22-25, Midc Satpur, Nashik 422 007 Pan : Aaace9787H Appellant Respondent

Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 144C(2)

condoning the delay. It is the Finance Act, 2010 which has retrospectively inserted sub-section (2A) to section 260A permitting the filing of appeal belatedly on showing sufficient cause. Now with the aid of sub-section (2A) of section 260A, a High Court has also been empowered to entertain an appeal filed beyond the period prescribed in section 260A(2

DEEPAK BHIKA SURYAWANSHI,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NASHIK

Appeal is allowed

ITA 98/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Shri Abhilasha Sanjay PawarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 250Section 254(1)Section 260ASection 270ASection 270A(8)Section 271(1)(c)Section 9

2 ITA No.98/PUN/2024, A.Y. 2018-19 section (8) thereof. His case in other words is that the Assessing Officer has failed to comply with the rigor of section 270A(8) and (9) (a to f) before concluding that the assessee committed any default of under-reporting of income as a consequence to misreporting. 3. Learned DR vehemently argued that