SAMEER ASHOK JOSHI,,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1,, NASHIK
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 572/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jan 2022AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.572/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Sameer Ashok Joshi, Vs. Acit, Circle-1, Raghukul Building, Nashik. Pimpalgaon (B), Tal. Niphad, Dist.- Nashik – 422209. Pan : Acxpj6376R Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sanket M. Joshi Revenue By : Shri M. J. Jasnani Date Of Hearing : 17.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 18.01.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 1, Nashik [‘Cit(A)’ For Short] Dated 21.10.2016 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. There Is Delay Of 445 Days In Filing The Present Appeal Before The Tribunal. Before Us, The Ld. Ar Submitted That The Delay Had Occurred On Account Of Wrong Advice Given By Income Tax
For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. JoshiFor Respondent: Shri M. J. Jasnani
Section 10Section 154
section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). An affidavit from the said ITP is also filed before us. It is only on the second opinion by another Chartered Accountant, namely, Shri
Sanket M. Joshi that the present appeal has been filed with the delay of 445 days. The ld. AR submitted that the delay is neither deliberate
