BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Hyderabad31Bangalore30Delhi26Ahmedabad22Jaipur16Kolkata7Surat7Indore6Chennai5Chandigarh5Nagpur5Pune4Rajkot4Jabalpur2Raipur1Varanasi1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 244A7Section 1475Section 1485Section 1544Addition to Income4Section 683Section 139(4)2Section 1442Section 692

APAASSO MALI,PUNE vs. ITO 11(1), SWARGATE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1110/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Suhas KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri A D Kulkarni
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 147rSection 148Section 249Section 249(2)

condonation of delay. 3.3 On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CIT(A) erred in Conducting proceedings ex-parte, not providing adequate and meaningful opportunities to present the case, relying on unverified information without giving an opportunity to rebut. Ground No. 4: 7 ITA No.1110/PUN/2025, AY 2018-19 4.1 On the facts and in the circumstances

Penalty2
Natural Justice2
Condonation of Delay2

ADESH TULSHIRAM MHATRE,DISTRICT RAIGAD vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2385/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar GundherFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 206CSection 234ASection 270ASection 69Section 69C

condonation of delay and denied natural justice. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in passing ex-parte order and without adjudicating grounds of appeal on merit. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs.3

AMIT SURESH AGRAWAL,SATARA vs. ITO WARD-2, SATARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2225/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2225/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Amit Suresh Agrawal, V The Income Tax Officer, Amit Trading Co, Plot No.35, S Ward-2, Satara. Satara – 415002. Maharashtra. Pan: Abgpa2925D Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Suhas Kulkarni – Advocate Revenue By Shri Eknath Abhang – Add.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 30/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2016-17 Dated 02.04.2025 Emanating From The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 147 R.W.S 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 10.05.2023. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 147Section 148Section 149(1)(b)Section 151Section 151ASection 153ASection 153CSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Since the primary addition itself is unjustified and liable to be deleted, the consequential interest charges are also unwarranted and liable to be deleted. 3 ITA No.2225/PUN/2025 [A] The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, or withdraw any of the aforesaid grounds, or to submit additional legal/factual grounds or evidence during

DISCOVERY DIGITAL NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 , NASHIK

ITA 2886/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Nov 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: \nShri Nimesh VoraFor Respondent: \nShri Vidya Ratan Kishore
Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 23Section 234DSection 244A

234D of the Act. The assessee requested the\nLd. AO vide letter dated 24.08.2021 to provide a copy of the rectification order\ndated 02.05.2018 however it was not provided. Thereafter, on 27.08.2021, the\nassessee filed a detailed legal submission on non-applicability of Circular No.\n9/2015 (supra) to the assessee's case along with other contentions raised in\nsupport