Search: condonation of delay

12 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14824 Section 194C18 Section 201(1)12 Section 25011 Section 270A10 Section 271A10 Section 271B10 Section 148A10 Penalty10

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

In the result, Assessee’s appeal

ITA 465/PUN/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmashali

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 80I

194C of the Act. 8. Now first we need to examine that “whether the ld. AO was required to examine the issue for payment to contractors and tax deducted thereon” Perusal of records shows that assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS for verification of “contract receipts/fees mismatch, sales turnover mismatch and tax credit mismatch”. The issue

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PVT.LTD.,MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), KOLHAPUR

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PVT.LTD.,MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), KOLHAPUR

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PVT.LTD.,MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), KOLHAPUR

DHIRAJ GIRIDHAR MASKE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, LATUR

DHIRAJ GIRIDHAR MASKE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, LATUR

DHIRAJ GIRIDHAR MHASKE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, PUNE

DHIRAJ GIRIDHAR MASKE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, LATUR

DHIRAJ GIRIDHAR MASKE,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, LATUR

SACHIN NAGRAJ CHHAJED,PUNE vs. ITO, PUNE

SACHIN NAGRAJ CHHAJED,PUNE vs. ITO, PUNE

MAHAVIR ADINATH SALVE,,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (1),, SOLAPUR